Back

At-Home High-Intensity Interval Training for Individuals with Paraplegia Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study

Linde, M. B.; Webb, K. L.; Veith, D. D.; Morkeberg, O. H.; Gill, M. L.; Van Straaten, M. G.; Laskowski, E. R.; Joyner, M. J.; Beck, L. A.; Zhao, K. D.; Wiggins, C. C.; Garlanger, K. L.

2023-06-29 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.06.21.23291711 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis pilot study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 16-week at-home high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). MethodsEight individuals (age: 47{+/-}11 (SD) years, 3 females) with SCI below the sixth thoracic vertebrae participated in a 16-week at-home HIIT program using an arm ergometer. Participants completed baseline graded exercise tests to determine target heart rate zones. HIIT was prescribed thrice per week. Each training session consisted of six one-minute bouts with a target heart rate [~]80% heart rate reserve (HRR), interspersed with two minutes of recovery at [~]30% HRR. A portable heart rate monitor and phone application provided visual feedback during training and allowed for measurements of adherence and compliance. Graded exercise tests were completed after 8 and 16 weeks of HIIT. Surveys were administered to assess participation, self-efficacy, and satisfaction. ResultsParticipants demonstrated a decrease in submaximal cardiac output (P=0.028) and an increase in exercise capacity (peak power output, P=0.027) following HIIT, indicative of improved exercise economy and maximal work capacity. An 87% adherence rate was achieved during the HIIT program. Participants reached a high intensity of 70% HRR or greater during [~]80% of intervals. The recovery HRR target was reached during only [~]35% of intervals. Self-reported metrics of satisfaction and self-efficacy with at-home HIIT scored moderate to high. ConclusionParticipants demonstrated an improvement in exercise economy and maximal work capacity following at-home HIIT. Additionally, participant adherence, compliance, satisfaction, and self-efficacy metrics suggest that at-home HIIT was easily implemented and enjoyable.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.6%
2
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
18
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
20
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
25
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%