Back

Engineered CD47 protects T cells for enhanced antitumor immunity

Yamada-Hunter, S. A.; Theruvath, J.; McIntosh, B. J.; Freitas, K. A.; Radosevich, M. T.; Leruste, A.; Dhingra, S.; Martinez-Velez, N.; Xu, P.; Delaidelli, A.; Desai, M. H.; Good, Z.; Labanieh, L.; Mount, C. W.; Chen, Y.; Heitzeneder, S.; Marjon, K. D.; Banuelos, A.; Khan, O.; Huang, J.; Wasserman, S. L.; Spiegel, J. Y.; Fernandez-Pol, S.; Sorensen, P. H.; Monje, M.; Majzner, R. G.; Weissman, I. L.; Sahaf, B.; Sotillo, E.; Cochran, J. R.; Mackall, C. L.

2023-06-22 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.06.20.545790 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adoptively transferred T cells and agents designed to block the CD47/SIRP axis are promising antitumor therapeutics, which activate distinct arms of the immune system. We administered anti-CD47 (CD47) with adoptively transferred T cells with the goal of enhancing antitumor efficacy but observed rapid macrophage-mediated clearance of T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or engineered T cell receptors, which blunted therapeutic benefit. CD47 mediated CAR T clearance was potent and rapid enough to serve as an effective safety switch. To overcome this challenge, we engineered a CD47 variant (47E) that engaged SIRP and provided a "dont-eat-me" signal that was not blocked by CD47 antibodies. TCR or CAR T cells expressing 47E were resistant to clearance by macrophages following CD47, and mediated significant, sustained macrophage recruitment into the TME. Although many of the recruited macrophages manifested an M2-like profile, the combined therapy resulted in synergistic enhancement in antitumor efficacy. This work identifies macrophages as major regulators of T cell persistence and illustrates the fundamental challenge of combining T cell directed therapeutics with those designed to activate macrophages. It further delivers a therapeutic approach capable of simultaneously harnessing the antitumor effects of T cells and macrophages that manifests markedly enhanced potency against solid tumors.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.