Genetic relationships between chronic pain, psychopathologies, and neuroticism.
Zorina-Lichtenwalter, K.; Bango, C. I.; Ceko, M.; Ashar, Y.; Keller, M. C.; Wager, T. D.; Friedman, N. P.
Show abstract
Chronic pain and psychiatric conditions have consistently demonstrated substantial overlap in risk factors, epidemiology, and effective treatments. Previous work has identified cross-condition latent factors underlying shared genetic risk for several distinct psychiatric conditions and pain conditions. Here, we sought to examine the relationships between these latent genetic factors to determine biological mechanisms common to both pain and psy-chiatric conditions. We combined two previously published genetic struc-turl equation models. The first model consisted of 24 pain conditions and their two latent factors: General and Musculoskeletal pain-specific. The second model consisted of 11 psychiatric conditions and their four latent factors: Externalizing, Internalizing, Compulsive Thought, and Psychotic Thought. The combined model of six factors and 35 conditions allowed us to estimate correlations between all factors and between conditions of one domain (pain) and factors of the other (psychiatric). We then added three measures of neuroticism (depressive affect subscale, worrying subscale, and total neuroticism score) to this model to examine correlations with all conditions and factors and test for possible explanation of pain-mental disorder relationships by neuroticism. We found that genetic associations between pain and psychiatric conditions were selective to the General Pain factor (and not Musculoskeletal) and Internalizing and Externalizing, but not Thought disorder factors. Neuroticism was associated with pain conditions to the extent that they loaded onto the General Pain factor (i.e., were associated with other pain conditions). Neuroticism also explained a substantial proportion of shared genetic variance between General Pain and Externalizing and between General Pain and Internalizing factors. Overall, the genetic risks shared among chronic pain and psychiatric conditions and neuroticism suggest shared biological mechanisms and underscore the importance of clinical assessment and treatment programs that leverage these commonalities.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A shared genetic signature for common chronic pain conditions and its impact on biopsychosocial traits 96%
- Genetic Variations in TrkB.T1 Isoform and Their Association with Somatic and Psychological Symptoms in Individuals with IBS 92%
- Effects of Centrally Acting Analgesics on Resting-State Electroencephalography Biomarker Candidates of Chronic Pain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender differences in PTSD severity and pain outcomes: baseline results from the LAMP trial 92%
- Affect and post-COVID-19 symptoms in daily life: An exploratory experience sampling study 91%
- Altered central pain processing in fibromyalgia - a multimodal neuroimaging case-control study using arterial spin labelling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 92%
- A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Neural Correlates and Common Biological Mechanisms of Psychopathology Spectra 91%
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Health Symptom Reduction Using Digital Therapeutics Care Informed by Genomic SNPs and Gut Microbiome Signatures 88%
- Precision Autism: Genomic Stratification of Disorders Making Up the Broad Spectrum May Demystify its "Epidemic Rates" 88%
- Depression, anxiety, and chronic fatigue symptoms in acute rheumatoid arthritis are associated with immune-inflammatory, autoimmune, endogenous opioid system and lactosylceramide signaling pathways: a nomothetic network approach 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.