Back

Explanations for higher-than-expected mortality from April 2021: a scoping review protocol

Douglas, M. J.; McCartney, G.; Walsh, D.; Donaghy, G.; Rae, D.; Wild, S.; Ramsay, J.

2023-06-20 public and global health
10.1101/2023.06.20.23291333 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to identify the explanations that have been proposed for higher-than-expected mortality following the first pandemic year, and any evidence to support or refute these explanations. IntroductionMortality rates have remained high compared to previous years, beyond the peak waves of Covid-19 mortality. Several explanations have been suggested for this. Identifying potential hypotheses and empirical studies investigating these is the first step before any further analytical work to investigate these trends can be undertaken. Inclusion criteriaThe scoping review will include papers proposing or investigating hypotheses for raised all cause or cause specific mortality, or reduced life expectancy, from April 2021 onwards compared to pre-pandemic levels. It will include papers on mortality in the whole population or any specific demographic sub-populations, in high income countries only, but exclude studies of mortality or survival following a healthcare intervention. MethodsA systematic search will be undertaken on Medline, Embase and Google Scholar for relevant articles published from 2021 onwards in English, with a similar search for grey literature on relevant government websites. Two reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, then full text articles with disagreements resolved by discussion or involvement of a third reviewer. Data extracted from selected articles will include the setting, population, hypothesis/es proposed, study type and findings if relevant. Included papers will be tabulated against the proposed hypotheses with any empirical evidence and hypotheses summarised narratively.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
40.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
5
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
7
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
9
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
10
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
11
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
14
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
21
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
26
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%