Future spinal reflex is embedded in primary motor cortex output
Umeda, T.; Yokoyama, O.; Suzuki, M.; Kaneshige, M.; Isa, T.; Nishimura, Y.
Show abstract
Mammals can execute intended limb movements despite the fact that spinal reflexes involuntarily modulate muscle activity. To generate appropriate muscle activity, the cortical descending motor output must coordinate with spinal reflexes, yet the underlying neural mechanism remains unclear. We simultaneously recorded activities in motor-related cortical areas, afferent neurons, and forelimb muscles of monkeys performing reaching movements. Motor-related cortical areas, primarily the primary motor cortex (M1), encode subsequent afferent activities attributed to forelimb movements. M1 also encodes a subcomponent of muscle activity evoked by these afferent activities, corresponding to spinal reflexes. Furthermore, selective disruption of the afferent pathway specifically reduced this subcomponent of muscle activity, suggesting that M1 output drives muscle activity not only through direct descending pathways but also through the "transafferent" pathway composed of descending plus subsequent spinal reflex pathways. Thus, M1 provides optimal motor output based on an internal forward model that prospectively computes future spinal reflexes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergence of a somatosensory tonotopic map for substrate vibration in the brainstem 98%
- Latent neural population dynamics underlying normal breathing, opioid induced respiratory depression, and gasping 98%
- Unsupervised Restoration of a Complex Learned Behavior After Large-Scale Neuronal Perturbation 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Potentiation of active locomotor state by spinal-projecting serotonergic neurons 98%
- A cortical circuit mechanism for coding and updating task structural knowledge in inference-based decision-making 98%
- Ventral frontostriatal circuitry mediates the computation of reinforcement from symbolic gains and losses 98%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.