Back

Self-assembly of Grb2 meshworks revealed by Grb2-Gab1497-528 complex structure

Breithaupt, C.; Gruber, T.; Mandel, K.; Lewitzky, M.; Meister, A.; Jochen, B.; Feller, S. M.; Stubbs, M. T.

2023-06-17 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.06.17.545433 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ubiquitously expressed adaptor protein Growth factor receptor bound protein 2 (Grb2) plays an essential role in signal transduction by binding to activated receptor tyrosine kinases through its SH2 domain and to downstream effectors via its N- and C-terminal SH3 domains (nSH3, cSH3). Here we present the first structure of ligand-bound full length Grb2. The crystal structure of Grb2 in complex with a bidentate nSH3-cSH3-binding peptide, derived from the multi-site docking protein Grb2- associated binder-1 (Gab1), provides molecular insight into effector recognition by Grb2 and reveals the assembly of a two-dimensional meshwork, consisting of multimeric filament-like Grb2 chains linked to each other by the bivalent bound Gab1497-528 peptide. Dominant contacts between Grb2 molecules in the multimer are provided by an intermolecular SH2/cSH3 domain interface that is also present in the closed dimer of ligand-free Grb2. We further show that Grb2 is able to self-assemble to form phase-separated condensates in solution. The Grb2 SH2 domain phosphotyrosine binding site is freely accessible in the multimeric assembly, and phase separation is fostered by addition of Gab1497- 528, as expected from the crystal structure. Multimeric assembly is also observed using a Grb2 SH2- cSH3 didomain construct, and suppressed using a Grb2 Tyr60Glu mutant, a mimic of the in vivo phosphorylated Tyr160 central to the SH2/cSH3 interface, demonstrating that an intact SH2/cSH3 interface is needed for Grb2 assembly in solution.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.