Identifying gaps in health literacy research through parental participation
Grepmeier, E.-M.; Poehnl, L.; von Sommoggy, J.; Pawellek, M.; Lander, J.; Schulz, A. A.; Hasenpusch, C.; Schwalfenberg, A.; Dierks, M.-L.; Bitzer, E. M.; Apfelbacher, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionInvolving patients and the public in design, conduct and dissemination of research has gained momentum in recent years. While methods to prioritize research on treatment uncertainties have been successfully applied for various disease entities, patient and public involvement has not been prominent to prioritize research in health literacy (HL). This study aimed to set up a participatory process on identifying HL research gaps from a parents perspective in two use cases: early childhood allergy prevention (ECAP) and COVID-19 in children with allergies (COVICAL). MethodsTo prepare and empower parents, we developed and provided preparatory webinars, introductory materials, i.e., factsheets and a brochure, and a scientific podcast with seven episodes. Recruitment was carried out by our cooperation partner German Allergy and Asthma Association e. V., via local day care centres and paediatricians as well as via snowballing. The identification of research gaps took place within five workshops with n= 55 participants, four face-to-face-workshops across Germany, one online workshop. Research ideas and needs were reviewed for overlap and redundancy and compared to the existing research state of the art. ResultsMore than 150 initial research ideas and needs were collected which after review were reduced to a total of 37 ECAP, 33 COVICAL and 7 generic HL research questions. These were particularly related to the ease of finding and presenting good quality health information, information environment, health communication, professional education, and HL testing. ConclusionsInvolving parents in the formulation of HL research priorities proved to be challenging but feasible. Research ideas often reflect wishes directed at health professionals and the health system, i.e., organizational, and systemic HL. An e Delphi process will follow to elicit the TOP 10 research priorities in each use case. This project will help to plan patient/parent centred HL research in ECAP and COVICAL. Plain Language SummaryWe carried out a participatory HL research exercise to identify HL research gaps from a parents perspective. The aim was to learn about parents/participants uncertainty in two use cases ECAP and COVICAL and what issues they would like to be answered by scientists. This resulted in a total of 37 ECAP, 33 COVICAL and 7 generic HL research questions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping the quality of Norwegian health information - Does it facilitate informed choices? 94%
- “It’s hard to keep a distance when you’re with someone you really care about” — a qualitative study of adolescents’ pandemic-related health literacy and how Covid-19 affects their lives 93%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Collecting genetic samples and linked mental health data from adolescents in schools: Protocol co-production and a mixed-methods pilot of feasibility and acceptability 93%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 91%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 93%
- Machine Learning in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Education: A Survey of Postgraduate Students at a Swiss University 91%
- Is my cough a cold or covid? A qualitative study of COVID-19 symptom recognition and attitudes towards testing in the UK 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 90%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 89%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding Covid-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK 92%
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 90%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.