Structural modeling of cytokine-receptor-JAK2 signaling complexes using AlphaFold Multimer
Pogozheva, I. D.; Cherepanov, S.; Park, S.-J.; Raghavan, M.; Im, W.; Lomize, A.
Show abstract
Homodimeric class 1 cytokine receptors include the erythropoietin (EPOR), thrombopoietin (TPOR), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSF3R), growth hormone (GHR), and prolactin receptors (PRLR). They are cell-surface single-pass transmembrane (TM) glycoproteins that regulate cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation and induce oncogenesis. An active TM signaling complex consists of a receptor homodimer, one or two ligands bound to the receptor extracellular domains and two molecules of Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) constitutively associated with the receptor intracellular domains. Although crystal structures of soluble extracellular domains with ligands have been obtained for all the receptors except TPOR, little is known about the structure and dynamics of the complete TM complexes that activate the downstream JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Three-dimensional models of five human receptor complexes with cytokines and JAK2 were generated using AlphaFold Multimer. Given the large size of the complexes (from 3220 to 4074 residues), the modeling required a stepwise assembly from smaller parts with selection and validation of the models through comparisons with published experimental data. The modeling of active and inactive complexes supports a general activation mechanism that involves ligand binding to a monomeric receptor followed by receptor dimerization and rotational movement of the receptor TM -helices causing proximity, dimerization, and activation of associated JAK2 subunits. The binding mode of two eltrombopag molecules to TM -helices of the active TPOR dimer was proposed. The models also help elucidating the molecular basis of oncogenic mutations that may involve non-canonical activation route. Models equilibrated in explicit lipids of the plasma membrane are publicly available.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Computer-guided Binding Mode Identification and Affinity Improvement of an LRR Protein Binder without Structure Determination 95%
- Insights on cross-species transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from structural modeling 95%
- A disordered encounter complex is central to the yeast Abp1p SH3 domain binding pathway 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Conformational Dynamics and Perturbation-Based Network Modeling for Mutational Profiling of Binding and Allostery in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variant Complexes with Antibodies: Balancing Local and Global Determinants of Mutational Escape Mechanisms 96%
- Definition and discovery of tandem SH3-binding motifs interacting with members of the p47phox-related protein family 96%
- Quantitative Characterization and Prediction of the Binding Determinants and Immune Escape Hotspots for Groups of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Against Omicron Variants: Atomistic Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Complexes with Antibodies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary progression of collective mutations in Omicron sub-lineages towards efficient RBD-hACE2: allosteric communications between and within viral and human proteins 96%
- Structural modelling of human complement FHR1 and two of its synthetic derivatives provides insight into their in-vivo functions 95%
- Predicted pH-dependent stability of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trimer from interfacial acidic groups 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Allosteric Determinants of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Binding with Nanobodies: Examining Mechanisms of Mutational Escape and Sensitivity of the Omicron Variant 96%
- Conformational Flexibility and Local Frustration in the Functional States of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants: Mutation-Induced Allosteric Modulation Mechanism of Functional Dynamics and Protein Stability 96%
- The molecular mechanism of positive allosteric modulation at the dopamine D1 receptor 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.