Back

Serological evidence of high pathogenicity virus infection in Eidolon helvum fruit bats in Nigeria

Cantoni, D.; Mayora Neto, M.; Auld, B.; Da Costa, K.; Del Rosario, J.; Ameh, V. O.; Sabeta, C. T.; Derveni, M.; Hamlet, A.; Wright, E.; Scott, S.; Giotis, E. S.; Banyard, A.; Temperton, N. J.

2023-06-14 microbiology
10.1101/2023.06.14.544916 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Eidolon helvum fruit bat is the most widely distributed fruit bat in Africa and is known to be a reservoir for several pathogenic viruses that can cause disease in humans. To assess the risk of zoonotic spillover, we conducted a serological survey of 304 serum samples from E. helvum bats that were captured for human consumption in Makurdi, Nigeria. Using pseudotyped viruses, we screened the samples for neutralising antibodies against viruses from the Coronaviridae, Filoviridae, Orthomyxoviridae and Paramyxoviridae families. We report the presence of neutralising antibodies against henipavirus lineage GH-M74a virus (odds ratio 6.23; p<0.001), Nipah virus (odds ratio 4.04; p=0.00031), bat influenza H17N10 virus (odds ratio 7.25; p<0.001) and no significant association with Ebola virus (odds ratio 0.56; p=0.375) in the bat cohort. The data suggest a potential risk of zoonotic spillover including the possible circulation of highly pathogenic viruses in E. helvum populations. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining sero-surveillance of E. helvum to monitor changes in virus prevalence and distribution over time and across different geographic locations. Article summary lineThe detection of neutralizing antibodies against henipavirus GH-M74a virus, Nipah virus, and H17N10 virus in Eidolon helvum bat sera from Nigeria using pseudotyped viruses suggests a potential risk of zoonotic spillover.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.