Back

Dietary nutrient balances and serum cholesterol: a new approach to an old question.

Correa Leite, M. L.

2023-06-20 nutrition
10.1101/2023.06.14.23291374 medRxiv
Show abstract

The continuing controversy concerning the relationships between diet and serum cholesterol levels highlights the need for innovative analytical approaches to the question. It is now acknowledged that dietary data are compositional in nature, but it is less widely recognised that the same is also true of any variable expressed in concentration units (mg/mL), such as serum cholesterol. Compositional data are parts of a whole and convey essentially relative information, which means they need to be interpreted in terms of the ratios between the individual components of the composition. The various formulations of log-ratio transformations proposed for compositional data analysis provide new variables that can be included in standard regression models as dependent and explanatory variables. Using data from an Italian population-based study, we describe the use of such methods to evaluate the relationships between a two-part composition (non-HDL and HDL cholesterol and their total) and three dietary nutrient compositions, and define multivariate linear regression equations that have one cholesterol log-ratio and the composition total as dependent variables and some macro- and micronutrient log-ratios as explanatory terms. Two alternative models are fitted: one containing the nutrient log-ratios in the form of their simplified expression as orthogonal balances; the other estimating the impact of nutrient pivot balances, which express the relative dominance of each of the parts of the dietary compositions. This approach to investigating the relationship between diet and serum cholesterol allows the simultaneous examination of the effects of non-redundant dietary components on both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of serum cholesterol profiles, and provides insights into some matters concerning public health.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.