Back

The Impact of Digital Technology in Care Homes on Unplanned Secondary Care Usage and Associated Costs

Garner, A.; Lewis, J.; Dixon, S.; Preston, N. J.; Caiado, C.; Hanratty, B.; Jones, M.; Knight, J.; Mason, S. M.

2023-06-16 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2023.06.13.23291324 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundA substantial number of emergency department (ED) attendances from care homes could be classed as avoidable. HealthCall is a technology that aims to streamline residents care by recording their observations electronically. Observations are fed to remote clinical staff to triage referrals. This study assessed the effectiveness of the HealthCall technology to safely reduce unplanned secondary care usage and associated costs. MethodsThe study involved 118 care homes across the North East from 2018-2021. Routinely collected NHS secondary care data from County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust was linked with data from the HealthCall technology App. Four outcomes were modelled monthly using Generalised Linear Mixed Models: counts of emergency attendances, emergency admissions, emergency readmissions (28-days), and length of stay of emergency admissions. A similar approach was taken for costs. The impact ofHealthCall was tested on each outcome using the models. FindingsData from 8,702 residents was used in the analysis. Results show HealthCall reduces the number of emergency attendances by 11%[6%-15%], emergency admissions by 25% 20%-39%], readmissions reduced by 29%[24%-33%] and length of stay by 11%[3%-18%] (with an additional month-by-month decrease of 28%[24%-34%]). The cost analysis found a cost reduction of {pound}57 per resident in 2018, increasing to {pound}113 in 2021. InterpretationThe introduction of a digital technology, such as HealthCall, significantly reduces contacts with and costs resulting from unplanned secondary care usage by care home residents. FundingThis work was funded by Health Data Research UK, CFC0124.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
9
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
11
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
30
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%