Back

Comparative Interactome Analysis of α-arrestin Families in Human and Drosophila

Lee, K.-T.; Pranoto, I. K.; Kim, S.-Y.; Choi, H.-J.; To, N. B.; Chae, H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, J.-E.; Kwon, Y. V.; Nam, J.-W.

2023-06-11 cell biology
10.1101/2023.06.11.544486 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The -arrestins form a large family of evolutionally conserved modulators that control diverse signaling pathways, including both G-protein-coupled receptor-(GPCR-) mediated and non-GPCR mediated pathways, across eukaryotes. However, unlike {beta}-arrestins, only a few -arrestin targets and functions have been characterized. Here, using affinity purification and mass spectrometry, we constructed interactomes for six human and twelve Drosophila -arrestins. The resulting high-confidence interactomes comprised 307 and 467 prey proteins in human and Drosophila, respectively. A comparative analysis of these interactomes predicted not only conserved binding partners, such as motor proteins, proteases, ubiquitin ligases, RNA splicing factors, and GTPase-activating proteins, but also those specific to mammals, such as histone modifiers and the subunits of V-type ATPase. Given the manifestation of the interaction between the human -arrestin, TXNIP, and the histone-modifying enzymes, including HDAC2, we undertook a global analysis of transcription signals and chromatin structures that were affected by TXNIP knockdown. We found that TXNIP activated targets by blocking HDAC2 recruitment to targets, a result that was validated by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Additionally, the interactome for an uncharacterized human -arrestin ARRDC5 uncovered multiple components in the V-type ATPase, which plays a key role in bone resorption by osteoclasts. Our study presents conserved and species-specific protein-protein interaction maps for -arrestins, which provide a valuable resource for interrogating their cellular functions for both basic and clinical research.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.