Back

Genome duplications, genomic conflict, and rapid phenotypic evolution characterize the Cretaceous radiation of Fagales

Yang, Y.-Y.; Stull, G. W.; Qu, X.; Zhao, L.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ma, H.; Li, D.; Smith, S. A.; Yi, T.

2023-06-12 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.06.11.544004 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIFlowering plant lineages display remarkable diversity in life history and morphological form. However our understanding of how this phenotypic diversity or disparity, arises and what, if any, relation there is to processes such as gene and genome duplication remains unlcear. C_LIO_LIHere we investigate the relationship between phenotypic and genomic evolution in the angiosperm order Fagales, a lineage of woody plants that has been a dominant component of temperate and subtropical forests since the Late Cretaceous. To this end, we examine newly generated trait and transcriptomic datasets spanning the phylogenetic breadth of the order, including most extant genera as well as a rich diversity of Cretaceous fossil representatives. C_LIO_LIOur phylogenomic analyses resolved the location of an ancient polyploidization event in Juglandaceae and identified hotspots of gene-duplication and genomic conflict across the order. Examinations of phenotypic evolution (including morphospace occupancy and rate shifts) show that the morphospace occupied by Fagales was filled by the early Cenozoic and rates of evolution were highest during the early radiation of the Fagales crown and its major families. Many instances of phenotypic rates also correspond to hotspots of gene duplication. C_LIO_LIOur results show that Fagales conform to an "early burst" model of phenotypic diversification, with morphospace being filled early in the groups evolutionary history. Our study is consistent with others showing a decoupling of species diversification with other biological processes (e.g., phenotypic and genomic evolution), underscoring the complexity of understanding the major drivers of plant evolution over broad timescales. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.