Back

BIFROST: a method for registering diverse imagingdatasets

Brezovec, L. E.; Berger, A. B.; Hao, Y. A.; Lin, A.; Ahmed, O. M.; Pacheco, D. A.; Thiberge, S. Y.; Murthy, M.; Clandinin, T. R.

2023-06-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.06.09.544408 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The heterogeneity of brain imaging methods in neuroscience provides rich data that cannot be captured by a single technique, and our interpretations benefit from approaches that enable easy comparison both within and across different data types. For example, comparing brain-wide neural dynamics across experiments and aligning such data to anatomical resources, such as gene expression patterns or connectomes, requires precise alignment to a common set of anatomical coordinates. However, this is challenging because registering in vivo functional imaging data to ex vivo reference atlases requires accommodating differences in imaging modality, microscope specification, and sample preparation. We overcome these challenges in Drosophila by building an in vivo reference atlas from multiphoton-imaged brains, called the Functional Drosophila Atlas (FDA). We then develop a two-step pipeline, BrIdge For Registering Over Statistical Templates (BIFROST), for transforming neural imaging data into this common space and for importing ex vivo resources such as connectomes. Using genetically labeled cell types as ground truth, we demonstrate registration with a precision of less than 10 microns. Overall, BIFROST provides a pipeline for registering functional imaging datasets in the fly, both within and across experiments. SignificanceLarge-scale functional imaging experiments in Drosophila have given us new insights into neural activity in various sensory and behavioral contexts. However, precisely registering volumetric images from different studies has proven challenging, limiting quantitative comparisons of data across experiments. Here, we address this limitation by developing BIFROST, a registration pipeline robust to differences across experimental setups and datasets. We benchmark this pipeline by genetically labeling cell types in the fly brain and demonstrate sub-10 micron registration precision, both across specimens and across laboratories. We further demonstrate accurate registration between in-vivo brain volumes and ultrastructural connectomes, enabling direct structure-function comparisons in future experiments.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.