Identifying gastric cancer molecular subtypes by integrating DNA-based hierarchical classification strategy and clinical stratification
Yang, B.; Liu, S.; Xie, J.; Tang, X.; Guan, P.; Zhu, Y.; Xia, L. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundMolecular subtyping has been introduced to better understand the genetic landscape of gastric cancer (GC), but current subtyping methods only had limited success because of the mixed use of molecular features, a lack of strategy optimization, and the limited availability of GC samples. The community urgently calls for a precise, and easily adoptable subtyping method to enable DNA-based early screening and treatment. MethodsBased on TCGA subtypes, we developed a novel classifier, termed Hierarchical DNA-based Classifier for Gastric Cancer Molecular Subtyping (HCG), leveraging all DNA-level alterations as predictors, including gene mutations, copy number aberrations and methylations. By adding the closely related esophageal adenocarcinomas (EA) dataset, we expanded the TCGA GC dataset for training and testing HCG (n=453). We optimized HCG with three hierarchical strategies evaluated by their overall accuracy using Lasso-Logistic regression, and by their clinical stratification capacity using multivariate survival analysis. We used difference tests to identify subtype-specific DNA alteration biomarkers based on HCG defined subtypes. ResultsOur HCG classifier achieved an overall AUC score of 0.95 and significantly improved the clinical stratification of patients (overall p-value=0.032). 25 subtype-specific DNA alterations were identified by difference tests, including high level of mutations in SYNE1, ITGB4 and COL22A1 genes for the MSI subtype, high level of methylations of ALS2CL, KIAA0406 and RPRD1B genes for the EBV subtype. ConclusionsHCG is an accurate and robust classifier for DNA-based GC molecular subtyping with high-performing clinical stratification capacity. The training and test datasets and analysis programs of HCG are available at https://github.com/labxscut/HCG.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mime: A flexible machine-learning framework to construct and visualize models for clinical characteristics prediction and feature selection 95%
- Finding new cancer epigenetic and genetic biomarkers from cell-free DNA by combining SALP-seq and machine learning:esophageal cancer as an example 93%
- Mechanistic insights into zearalenone-accelerated colorectal cancer in mice using integrative multi-omics approaches 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive Targeted Panel of 295 Genes: Unveiling Key Disease Initiating and Transformative Biomarkers in MultipleMyeloma 95%
- MUC1 and MUC4 expression are inversely correlated and trigger immunological response and transport pathways in gliomas 94%
- Single cell gene expression profiling of nasal ciliated cells reveals distinctive biological processes related to epigenetic mechanisms in patients with severe COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Epithelial and Stromal Immune Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis Reveals Prognostic Factors with Digital Cytometry 96%
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 94%
- Prognosis-related molecular subtypes and immune features associated with hepatocellular carcinoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glyoxalase 1: emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in cervical cancer progression 95%
- Predicting cancer origins with a DNA methylation-based deep neural network model 95%
- Identification of cuproptosis and ferroptosis-related subtypes and development of a prognostic signature in colon cancer 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.