Quantitative and geometric motor unit analysis using magnetomyography.
Broser, P. J.; Thomas Middelmannc, T.; Nouryd, N.; Siegel, M.; Hartwig, S.; Klotz, T.; Marquetand, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveMagnetomyography (MMG) is currently a rather unexplored neurophysiological modality and it is not known to which extent the number of motor units have an influence on the amplitude and the direction of the MMG-signal. MethodsA simultaneous invasive electromyography (iEMG), surface EMG (sEMG) and MMG using optically pumped magnetometer (OPM-MMG) of the right abductor digiti minimi muscle (ADM) of two healthy participants was recorded during a stepwise increasing electrical stimulation of the ADM innervating ulnar nerve. Then, the number of electrically evoked motor units was estimated (MUNE), the magnetic field vectors were reconstructed and aligned to the muscular anatomy. In addition, a finite element simulation of the ADM muscle was performed and compared to the experimental data. ResultsThe more motor units were activated by increasing electrical stimulation, the stronger the MMG signal became, which was the same for iEMG&sEMG (r>0.96). The finite element simulation showed the same relation between the magnetic and electric signal. Further, based on the simulation the number of activated muscular fibers and neuromuscular units could be estimated the ratio of signal to fibers determined. In addition, the precise vector direction of the magnetomyography (MMG) signal can reliably be recorded following the electric stimulation of the ulnar nerve and followed the muscle fiber direction. ConclusionThe MMG signal can be used to determine the amount of activated motor units, but also analysis of the magnetic field vector corresponds to the muscle fiber direction, offering a functional as well as structural characterization of muscles. The modelling and simulation is especially helpful to understand the magnetic muscular signal in detail. SignificanceNext to establishing MUNE in MMG, our results provide the first quantitative comparison between MMG vs. iEMG&sEMG and highlight the possibilities of the vector component analysis in MMG. Highlights- Comparative study of MMG, iEMG&sEMG using electrically induced activation of motor units. - MUNE in MMG is possible and is potentially superior to surface EMG. - The vector components of the MMG-signal correspond to the muscle fiber direction of the muscle. - Finite element simulation of the muscular magnetic and electric signal
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Spinal Cord Stimulation for Providing Natural Somatosensory Feedback in Bionic Prostheses for Transhumeral Amputees 95%
- Deep Learning-Based Approaches for Decoding Motor Intent from Peripheral Nerve Signals 93%
- Simulation of closed-loop deep brain stimulation control schemes for suppression of pathological beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated methodology for optimal selection of the minimum electrode subset for accurate EEG source estimation based on Genetic Algorithm optimization 94%
- EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors 93%
- Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of muscle contraction in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.