Back

SARS-CoV-2 Spread Under the Controlled-Distancing Model of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Rohweder, R.; Schuler-Faccini, L.; Ferraz, G.

2023-06-12 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.06.09.23291044 medRxiv
Show abstract

In early 2020, the government of Rio Grande do Sul established a public-health assessment-response framework to halt the spread of SARS-CoV-2, called controlled-distancing model (CDM). This framework subdivided the state in 21 regions where it evaluated a composite index of disease transmission and health-service capacity. Updated on a weekly basis, the index placed regions on a color-coded scale of flags, which guided adoption of non-pharmaceutical interventions. We aim to evaluate the extent to which the CDM accurately assessed transmission and the effectiveness of its responses throughout 2020. We estimated the weekly effective reproduction number (Rt) of SARS-CoV-2, for each region, using a renewal-equation-based statistical model of notified COVID-19 deaths. Using Rt estimates, we explored whether flag colors assigned by the CDM either reflected or affected SARS-CoV-2 dissemination. Flag assignments did reflect variations in Rt, to a limited extent, but we found no evidence that they affected Rt in the short term. Medium-term effects were apparent in only four regions after eight or more weeks of red-flag assignment. Analysis of Google movement metrics showed no evidence that people moved differently under different flags. The dissociation between flag colors and the propagation of SARS-CoV-2 does not support the claim that non-pharmaceutical interventions are ineffective. Our results show, however, that decisions made under the CDM framework were ineffective both for influencing the movement of people and for halting the spread of the virus.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
8
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
24
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%