Differential activity patterns in the upper and lower blade of the dentate gyrus
Fredes, F.; Masaracchia, L.; Capogna, M.; Vidaurre, D.
Show abstract
The dentate gyrus is considered the first stage in the trisynaptic circuit of the hippocampus. Granule cells of the dentate gyrus fire very sparsely with a low probability of overlapping patterns of active neurons. This characteristic supports the most prevalent view of the dentate gyrus function as that of a pattern separator: to generate dissimilar neuronal representations from overlapping input states that represent similar but not identical environments. However, there are two distinct granule cell blades that have been shown to have different activity patterns: the upper blade and the lower blade. These may support different purposes, but their differential function is not well understood. Here we have recorded calcium imaging data from both the upper and the lower blade of the dentate gyrus from two mice (the upper blade from one, the lower blade from the other), while they perform a simple decision-making task. We found that only the lower blade encodes subjective emotional response while the upper blade preferentially encodes the actual response. Importantly, we found that correlations between cells carried more information about these two behavioural variables than individual firings, suggesting that neuron correlations encode here important information above and beyond individual unit activity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Consistent population activity on the scale of minutes in the mouse hippocampus 97%
- A configural context signal simultaneously but separably drives positioning and orientation of hippocampal place fields 96%
- Single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe flexibly shift representations across spatial and memory tasks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.