Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis.
Chengrui, A.; Farley, A. M.; Palmer, S.; Liu, D.; Kousa, A. I.; Rouse, P.; Major, V.; Sweetman, J.; Morys, J.; Corsinotti, A.; Nichols, J.; Ure, J.; McLay, R.; Boulter, L.; Chapman, J. S.; Tomlinson, S. R.; Blackburn, C. C.
Show abstract
During development, cortical (c) and medullary (m) thymic epithelial cells (TEC) arise from the third pharyngeal pouch endoderm. Current models suggest that within the thymic primordium most TEC exist in a bipotent/common thymic epithelial progenitor cell (TEPC) state able to generate both cTEC and mTEC, at least until embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) in the mouse. This view, however, is challenged by recent transcriptomics and genetic evidence. We therefore set out to investigate the fate and potency of TEC in the early thymus. Here using single cell (sc) RNAseq we identify a candidate mTEC progenitor population at E12.5, consistent with recent reports. Via lineage-tracing we demonstrate this population as mTEC fate-restricted, validating our bioinformatics prediction. Using potency analyses we also establish that most E11.5 and E12.5 progenitor TEC are cTEC- fated. Finally we show that overnight culture causes most if not all E12.5 cTEC-fated TEPC to acquire functional bipotency, and provide a likely molecular mechanism for this changed differentiation potential. Collectively, our data overturn the widely held view that a common TEPC predominates in the E12.5 thymus, showing instead that sublineage-primed progenitors are present from the earliest stages of thymus organogenesis but that these early fetal TEPC exhibit cell-fate plasticity in response to extrinsic factors. Our data provide a significant advance in the understanding of fetal thymic epithelial development and thus have implications for thymus-related clinical research, in particular research focussed on generating TEC from pluripotent stem cells.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- NOTCH1 signaling establishes the medullary thymic epithelial cell progenitor pool during mouse fetal development 94%
- IL7R is required for hematopoietic stem cell reconstitution of tissue-resident lymphoid cells 93%
- Identification of a myofibroblast differentiation program during neonatal lung development 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fam49b dampens TCR signal strength to regulate survival of positively selected thymocytes 95%
- Integrative analysis of scRNAs-seq and scATAC-seq revealed transit-amplifying thymic epithelial cells expressing autoimmune regulator 94%
- CCR4 and CCR7 differentially regulate thymocyte subset localization with distinct outcomes for central tolerance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combined multidimensional single-cell protein and RNA profiling dissects the cellular and functional heterogeneity of thymic epithelial cells 95%
- Age-Dependent Changes in the Progenitor Translatome Coordinated in part by Tsc1 Increase Perception of Signaling Inputs to End Nephrogenesis 94%
- Semaphorin 3A induces cytoskeletal paralysis in tumor-specific CD8+ T cells 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Redundant and additive functions of the four Lef/Tcf transcription factors in lung epithelial progenitors 94%
- A Hedgehog-FGF signaling axis patterns anterior mesoderm during gastrulation 94%
- T Lymphocyte-Specific Deletion of SHP1 and SHP2 Promotes Activation-Induced Cell Death of CD4+ T Cells and Impairs Antitumor Response 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developmental dynamics of the neural crest-mesenchymal axis in creating the thymic microenvironment 95%
- Gastrulation-stage gene expression in Nipbl+/- mouse embryos foreshadows the development of syndromic birth defects 94%
- Origin, specification and differentiation of a rare supporting-like lineage in the developing mouse gonad 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.