Back

Exposure to false cardiac feedback alters pain perception and anticipatory cardiac frequency.

Parrotta, E.; Bach, P.; Pezzulo, G.; Perrucci, M. G.; Costantini, M.; Ferri, F.

2023-06-09 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.06.07.544025 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The experience of pain, like other interoceptive processes, has recently been conceptualized in terms of predictive coding and free energy frameworks. In these views, the brain integrates sensory, proprioceptive, and interoceptive signals to generate probabilistic inferences about upcoming events, which shape both the state and the perception of our inner body. Here we ask whether it is possible to induce pain expectations by providing false faster (vs. slower) acoustic cardiac feedback before administering electrical cutaneous shocks. We test whether these expectations will shape both the perception of pain and the bodys physiological state toward prior predictions. Results confirmed that faster cardiac feedback elicited pain expectations that affected both perceptual pain judgments and the bodys physiological response. Perceptual pain judgments were biased towards the expected level of pain, such that participants illusorily perceived identical noxious stimuli as more intense and unpleasant. Physiological changes mirrored the predicted level of pain, such that participants actual cardiac response in anticipation of pain stimuli showed a deceleration in heart rate, in line with the well-known orienting cardiac response in anticipation of threatening stimuli (Experiment 1). In a control experiment, such perceptual and cardiac modulations were dramatically reduced when the feedback reproduced an exteroceptive, instead of interoceptive, cardiac feedback (Experiment 2). These findings show that cardiac perception can be understood as interoceptive inference that modulates both our perception and the physiological state of the body, thereby actively generating the interoceptive and autonomic consequences that have been predicted.

Published in eLife (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

eLife · published here
5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.4%
2
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.4%
3
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
5
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
The Journal of Pain
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
7
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
10
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
13
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
17
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.1%
19
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
24
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
International Journal of Psychophysiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
26
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Neurobiology of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%