Back

Physiology-guided quantitative symptom analysis for gastroduodenal disorders

Schamberg, G.; Varghese, C.; Uren, E.; Calder, S.; O'Grady, G.; Gharibans, A. A.; BSGM Consortium,

2023-06-12 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.06.07.23291112 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCurrent approaches to symptom-based classifications in gastroduodenal disorders are binary and substantially overlapping. We aimed to develop a standardized and quantitative system for classifying patient-level symptom profiles guided on physiological principles. MethodsA large database (n = 787) of 4.5 h (30 min baseline; 4-h postprandial) Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry, NZ) recordings were used to identify, and quantify distinct symptom patterns based on established gastroduodenal physiology concepts. Tests comprised a standardized meal challenge and symptoms were simultaneously recorded at minimum 15 minute intervals using a 10-point likert scale with pictograms encoded in a validated digital App. Key ResultsSix symptom profiles were defined. The meal change metric was used to define meal-induced and meal-relieved symptom profiles, defined as an increase (+2) or decrease (-2) in the average symptom severity between the first post- and pre-prandial hours of recordings. The continuous profile was defined as a reduced range (<3; i.e., difference between the 95th and 5th percentile symptom severity), and thresholded to the 5th percentile of symptom severity being > 2. The symptom/amplitude correlation metric defined the sensorimotor profile, thresholded when the correlation was >0.5. The symptom/amplitude time lag metric was used to define activity-relieved and post-gastric symptom profiles, defined as negative (< -0.25) or positive (>0.25) average difference between the cumulative distribution functions of the symptom and amplitude curves. Conclusions & InferencesStandardized quantification of symptom profiles in relation to a meal-stimulus and gastric amplitude offer a novel classification scheme based on gastroduodenal physiology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.7%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
14
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%