Back

Quantifying and predicting chromatic thresholds

Zhou, J.

2023-06-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.06.06.543898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Perceptual thresholds measured in the two-dimensional chromatic diagram are elliptical in shape. Across different parts of the chromatic diagram, these ellipses vary in their sizes, their tilting angles, and in how much they elongate. Overall, the chromatic thresholds exhibit intriguing patterns that were reflected in McAdams measurements in 1942. Previously, da Fonseca and Samengo (2016) used a neural model combined with Fisher information (a quantification of perceptual thresholds) to predict the pattern of chromatic thresholds measured in human observers. The model assumes linear cone responses paired with Poisson noise. I furthered the analysis, and studied two additional aspects of chromatic perception. First, I quantified how the pattern of chromatic thresholds vary when the proportion of three cone types (short-, mid-, and long-wavelength) varies. This analysis potentially leads to efficient estimation of thresholds across the chromatic diagram. Second, I analyzed to what extent the assumption of Poisson noise contributes to the threshold predictions. Surprisingly, eliminating Poisson noise betters the model prediction. So in addition to Poisson noise, I examined three alternative noise assumptions, and achieved improved predictions to MacAdams data. At last, I examined an application using the improved model-predictions. The total number of cones, as well as the proportion of S cone vary across retinal eccentricities. I showed that these two variations predict chromatic threshold patterns across retinal eccentricities are drastically different.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.2%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
10
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
16
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
18
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
24
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%