Back

Pan-tissue mitochondrial phenotyping reveals lower OXPHOS expression and function across tumor types

Boykov, I.; Montgomery, M.; Hagen, J.; Aruleba, R.; McLaughlin, K.; Coalson, H.; Nelson, M.; Pereyra, A.; Ellis, J.; Zeczycki, T.; Vohra, N.; Tan, S.-F.; Cabot, M.; Fisher-Wellman, K.

2023-06-04 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.06.04.542600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to combat cancer is increasingly being investigated using a variety of small molecule inhibitors. Clinical success for these inhibitors has been hampered due to serious side-effects potentially arising from the inability to discriminate between non-cancerous and cancerous mitochondria. Although mitochondrial oxidative metabolism is essential for malignant growth, mitochondria OXPHOS is also essential to the physiology of all organs, including high-energy-demand organs like the heart. In comparing tumor OXPHOS reliance to these preeminent oxidative organs it is unclear if a therapeutic window for targeting mitochondrial OXPHOS in cancer exists. To address this gap in knowledge, mitochondrial OXPHOS was comprehensively evaluated across various murine tumors and compared to both matched normal tissues and other organs. When compared to both matched normal tissues, as well as high OXPHOS reliant organs like heart, intrinsic expression of the OXPHOS complexes, as well as OXPHOS flux were consistently lower across distinct tumor types. Operating on the assumption that intrinsic OXPHOS expression/function predicts OXPHOS reliance in vivo, these data suggest that pharmacologic blockade of mitochondrial OXPHOS likely compromises bioenergetic homeostasis in healthy oxidative organs prior to impacting tumor mitochondrial flux in a clinically meaningful way. Although these data caution against the use of indiscriminate mitochondrial inhibitors for cancer treatment, considerable heterogeneity was observed across tumor types with respect to both mitochondrial proteome composition and substrate-specific flux, highlighting the possibility for targeting discrete mitochondrial proteins or pathways unique to a given tumor type.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
4
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
Mitochondrion
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
9
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.3%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
14
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
19
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
24
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%