Measuring Social Determinants of Health in the All of Us Research Program: Technical Document
Tesfaye, S.; Cronin, R.; Lopez-Class, M.; Chen, Q.; Foster, C. S.; Gu, C.; Guide, A.; Hiatt, R. A.; Johnson, A.; Joseph, C. L.; Khatri, P.; Lim, S.; Litwin, T. R.; Munoz, F. A.; Ramirez, A.; Sansbury, H.; Schlundt, D. G.; Viera, E. N.; Dede-Yildirim, E.; Clark, C. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo advance precision medicine and improve population health, the All of Us Research Program aims to collect data, including a survey of social determinants of health (SDOH), from over 1 million participants. This report (1) outlines the process used to construct the All of Us SDOH survey and (2) presents the psychometric characteristics and scoring recommendations for SDOH survey measures. MethodsA consensus process was used to select a definition of SDOH and conceptual frameworks to develop inclusion and exclusion criteria and priorities for construct consideration. Cognitive interviewing was used to provide an assessment of SDOH survey item performance in English and Spanish. Scales and scored items were constructed in alignment with validated literature. Item non-response was calculated, and Cronbach s alpha was used to analyze the psychometric properties of each scale, overall and by demographic characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine if demographic categories were associated with item non-response. ResultsTwenty-nine percent (N=117,783) of All of Us participants submitted SDOH survey data by June 30, 2022. Among those who provided any SDOH survey data, item non-response was infrequent, with most scales having less than 5% incalculable scores due to item non-response. Item non-response varied most along the lines of racial identity, educational attainment, and the language in which the survey was administered (Spanish or English). In our regression models, for most scales, patterns of missing data due to item non-response were seen by racial identity, educational attainment, income level, and age. Internal consistency reliability was greater than 0.80 for almost all scales, with variability by racial identity, educational attainment, and the language of survey administration. ConclusionThe SDOH survey demonstrated good to excellent reliability across several measures of SDOHs and within multiple population groups that are underrepresented in biomedical research. Bias due to survey non-response and item non-response should be monitored and addressed as the survey is fielded more completely.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of Testing Availability on Intentions to Isolate during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Trial 94%
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 94%
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative Social Disadvantage and Health-Related Quality of Life: National Health Interview Survey 2013-2017 94%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 94%
- Physical Activity Behaviour in Middle-Aged and Older Canadian Women and Men: An Analysis of the CLSA 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 risk perceptions of social interaction and essential activities and inequity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative survey 96%
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 95%
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression at the intersection of race/ethnicity, sex/gender, and sexual orientation in a nationally representative sample of US adults: A design-weighted MAIHDA 94%
- Estimating the Effect of Social Distancing Interventions on COVID-19 in the United States 93%
- Lifecourse Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Performance Among Midlife Latina Women in a California Agricultural Region 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- Life Expectancy and Voting Patterns in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election 92%
- Racial Differences in Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Physical, Mental, and Behavioral Health 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.