Harnessing deep learning to analyze cryptic morphological variability of Marchantia polymorpha
Tomizawa, Y.; Minamino, N.; Shimokawa, E.; Kawamura, S.; Komatsu, A.; Hiwatashi, T.; Nishihama, R.; Ueda, T.; Kohchi, T.; Kondo, Y.
Show abstract
Characterizing phenotypes is a fundamental aspect of biological sciences, although it can be challenging due to various factors. For instance, the liverwort (Marchantia polymorpha), a model system for plant biology, exhibits morphological variability, making it difficult to identify and quantify distinct phenotypic features using objective measures. To address this issue, we utilized a deep learning-based image classifier that can handle plant images directly without manual extraction of phenotypic features, and analyzed bright-field images of M. polymorpha. This dioicous plant species exhibits morphological differences between male and female wild accessions at an early stage of gemmaling growth, although it remains elusive whether the differences are attributable to sexual dimorphism or autosomal genetic variation. To dissect the genomic factors, we established a male and female set of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from a set of male and female wild accessions. We then trained deep-learning models to classify the sexes of the RILs and the wild accessions. Our results showed that the trained classifiers accurately classified male and female gemmalings of wild accessions in the first week of growth, confirming the intuition of plant researchers in a reproducible and objective manner. In contrast, the RILs were less distinguishable, indicating that the differences between the parental wild accessions arose from autosomal variations instead of sexual dimorphism. Furthermore, we validated our trained models by an "explainable AI" technique that highlights image regions relevant to the classification. Our findings demonstrate that the classifier-based approach provides a powerful tool for analyzing plant species that lack standardized phenotyping metrics.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Samplify: A versatile tool for image-based segmentation and annotation of seed abortion phenotypes 96%
- High throughput measurement of Arabidopsis thaliana fitness traits using deep learning 95%
- Identification of new marker genes from plant single-cell RNA-seq data using interpretable machine learning methods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Industrial chicory genome gives insight into the molecular time table of anther development and male sterility 94%
- Chromosome-level genome assemblies for two quinoa inbred lines from northern and southern highlands of Altiplano where quinoa originated 94%
- QTL mapping for seed morphology using the instance segmentation neural network in Lactuca spp. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Telomere-to-telomere, gap-free genome of mung beans (Vigna radiata) provides insights into domestication under structural variation 93%
- GWAS identifies candidate genes controlling adventitious rooting in Populus trichocarpa 93%
- Deciphering octoploid strawberry evolution with serial LTR similarity matrices for subgenome partition 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a mobile, high-throughput, and low-cost image-based plant growth phenotyping system 96%
- Optimizing genomic prediction for complex traits via investigating multiple factors in switchgrass 94%
- Paralog editing tunes rice stomatal density to maintain photosynthesis and improve drought tolerance 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.