Protocol for the development of an artificial intelligence extension to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022
Hawksworth, C.; Elvidge, J.; Knies, S.; Zemplenyi, A.; Petyko, Z.; Siirtola, P.; Chandra, G.; Srivastava, D.; Denniston, A.; Chalkidou, A.; Delaye, J.; Nousios, P.; Gomes, M.; Avsar, T. S.; Wang, J.; Petrou, S.; Dawoud, D. M.
Show abstract
1.2.IntroductionAI interventions for health care are on the rise. Decisions about coverage and reimbursement are often informed by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies, who rely on Health Economic Evaluations (HEEs) to estimate the value for money (cost effectiveness) of interventions. Transparent reporting of HEEs ensures they can be used for decision making. Reporting guidance exists to support this, such as the Consolidated Health Economic Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. We aim to identify consensus about specific items should be reported by HEEs that evaluate AI interventions and, if such items are identified, to develop them into an extension to CHEERS: "CHEERS-AI". Methods and analysisThe project will have 4 phases: O_LIPhase 1 is a literature review to help identify potential AI-related reporting items. C_LIO_LIPhase 2 commences a Delphi process, with a series of surveys to elicit the importance of the potential AI-related reporting items. C_LIO_LIPhase 3 is a consensus-generation meeting to agree on the final extension items. C_LIO_LIPhase 4 is dissemination of the projects outputs. C_LI Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethical approval from Newcastle University Ethics Committee (reference: 28568/2022). The findings will be available in as an open access article and disseminated through blogs, newsletters, and presentations. 1.3. Funding statementThis study is supported by the Next Generation Health Technology Assessment (HTx) project. The HTx project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N{o} 825162. This dissemination reflects only the views of the authors and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 94%
- Protocol for Development of a Reporting Guideline for Causal and Counterfactual Prediction Models 94%
- Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 94%
- Artificial Intelligence for Contextual Well-being: Protocol for an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study with Medical Students as a Social Microcosm 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The roadmap for implementing value based healthcare in European university hospitals - consensus report and recommendations 92%
- Loon Lens 1.0 Validation: Agentic AI for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Literature Reviews 91%
- Validity, Reliability, and Framing Effects in Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off Studies: A Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 92%
- Integrating Community-Based Health Information System with a Patient-Centered Medical Home to Improve Care of Patients with Hypertension: A Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol 92%
- The Monash Learning Health System Maturity Matrix: Codesign of a Tool to Measure and Guide Improvement in Complex Health System Behaviour 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Driven Early Detection of Severe Influenza in Jiangsu, China: A Deep Learning Model Validated Through The Design of Multi-Center Clinical Trials and Prospective Real-World Deployment 93%
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.