Back

Solvent based fractional biosynthesis, phytochemical analysis and biological activity of silver nanoparticles obtained from extract of Salvia moorcroftiana

Khan, M.; Khan, T.; Aasim, M.; Sherazi, T. A.; Wahab, S.; Zahoor, M.

2023-06-02 microbiology
10.1101/2023.05.30.542991 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multi-drug resistant bacteria sometimes known as "superbugs" developed through overuse and misuse of antibiotics are determined to be sensitive to small concentrations of silver nanoparticles. Various methods and sources are under investigation for the safe and efficient synthesis of silver nanoparticles having effective antibacterial activity even at low concentrations. We used a medicinal plant named Salvia moorcroftiana to extract phytochemicals with antibacterial, antioxidant, and reducing properties. Three types of solvents; from polar to nonpolar, i.e., water, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and hexane, were used to extract the plant as a whole and as well as in fractions. The biosynthesized silver nanoparticles in all extracts (except hexane-based extract) were spherical, smaller than 20 nm, polydispersed (PDI ranging between 0.2 and 0.5), and stable with repulsive force of action (average zeta value = -18.55{+/-}1.17). The tested bacterial strains i.e., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis were found to be sensitive to even small concentrations of AgNPs, especially P. aeruginosa. The antibacterial effect of these AgNPs was associated with their ability to generate reactive oxygen species. DMSO (in fraction) could efficiently extract antibacterial phytochemicals and showed activity against MDR bacteria (inhibition zone = 11-12 mm). Thus, the antibacterial activity of fractionated DMSO extract was comparable to that of AgNPs because it contained phytochemicals having solid antibacterial potential. Furthermore, AgNPs synthesized from this extract owned superior antibacterial activity. However, whole aqueous extract based AgNPs MIC was least (7-32 {micro}g/mL) as compared to others.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.