A semi-quantitative, rapid, point of care SARS-CoV-2 serologic assay predicts neutralizing antibody levels
Markmann, A. J.; Bhowmik, D. R.; Jiang, B.; Van Hoy, M.; Wang, F.; Hou, Y. J.; Baric, R. S.; de Silva, A. M.; Bartelt, L. A.
Show abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused millions of deaths and the continued emergence of new variants suggests continued circulation in the human population. In the current time of vaccine availability and new therapeutic development, including antibody-based therapies, many questions about long-term immunity and protection remain uncertain. Identification of protective antibodies in individuals is often done using highly specialized and challenging assays such as functional neutralizing assays, which are not available in the clinical setting. Therefore, there is a great need for the development of rapid, clinically available assays that correlate with neutralizing antibody assays to identify individuals who may benefit from additional vaccination or specific COVID-19 therapies. In this report, we apply a novel semi-quantitative method to an established lateral flow assay (sqLFA) and analyze its ability to detect the presence functional neutralizing antibodies from the serum of COVID-19 recovered individuals. We found that the sqLFA has a strong positive correlation with neutralizing antibody levels. At lower assay cutoffs, the sqLFA is a highly sensitive assay to identify the presence of a range of neutralizing antibody levels. At higher cutoffs, it can detect higher levels of neutralizing antibody with high specificity. This sqLFA can be used both as a screening tool to identify individuals with any level of neutralizing antibody to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), or as a more specific tool to identify those with high neutralizing antibody levels who may not benefit from antibody-based therapies or further vaccination.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the performance of a serological point-of-care test in measuring detectable antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Serological profiles of pan-coronavirus-specific responses in COVID-19 patients using a multiplexed electro-chemiluminescence-based testing platform 96%
- A novel assessment method for COVID-19 humoral immunity duration using serial measurements in naturally infected and vaccinated subjects 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels are concordant across multiple platforms but are not fully predictive of sterilizing immunity 96%
- A Label-Free SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test and a Longitudinal Study of Antibody Characteristics in COVID-19 Patients 96%
- Clinical evaluation of the Abbott Alinity SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific quantitative IgG and IgM assays in infected, recovered, and vaccinated groups 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A highly sensitive and specific SARS-CoV-2 spike- and nucleoprotein-based fluorescent multiplex immunoassay (FMIA) to measure IgG, IgA and IgM class antibodies 96%
- COVID-19 antibody detection and assay performance using red cell agglutination 95%
- Rapid semi-quantitative point of care diagnostic test for post vaccination antibody monitoring 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance and validation of an adaptable multiplex assay for detection of serologic response to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination 96%
- Qualification of ELISA and neutralization methodologies to measure SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity using human clinical samples 95%
- Highly versatile antibody binding assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 serological assays in a longitudinal cohort of mild COVID-19 patients: sensitivity, specificity and association with virus neutralization test 95%
- TOP-Plus is a Versatile Biosensor Platform for Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Durability 95%
- Association between neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and commercial serological assays 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.