Back

Comparison of caffeine consumption behavior with plasma caffeine levels as exposures in drug-target Mendelian randomization and implications for interpreting effects on obesity

Woolf, B.; Cronje, H. T.; Zagkos, L.; Larsson, S. C.; Gill, D.; Burgess, S.

2023-06-01 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.05.30.23290752
Show abstract

Drug-target Mendelian randomization (MR) is a popular approach for exploring the effects of pharmacological targets. Cis-MR designs select variants within the gene region that code for a protein of interest to mimic pharmacological perturbation. An alternative uses variants associated with behavioral proxies of target perturbation, such as drug usage. Both have been employed to investigate the effects of caffeine but have drawn different conclusions. We use the effects of caffeine on body mass index (BMI) as a case study to highlight two potential flaws of the latter strategy in drug-target MR: misidentifying the exposure and using invalid instruments. Some variants associate with caffeine consumption because of their role in caffeine metabolism. Since people with these variants require less caffeine for the same physiological effect, the direction of the caffeine-BMI association is flipped depending on whether estimates are scaled by caffeine consumption or plasma caffeine levels. Other variants seem to associate with caffeine consumption via behavioral pathways. Using multivariable-MR, we demonstrate that caffeine consumption behavior influences BMI independently of plasma caffeine. This implies the existence of behaviorally mediated exclusion restriction violations. Our results support the superiority of cis-MR study designs in pharmacoepidemiology over the use of behavioral proxies of drug targets.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 17%
10.0%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 59%
7.4%
3
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 0.2%
5.7%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 2%
4.4%
5
Genetic Epidemiology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 18%
4.4%
7
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 4%
4.4%
8
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 9%
2.8%
9
Epidemiology
based on 26 papers
Top 0.6%
2.4%
10
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
2.3%
11
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 0.5%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 6%
1.7%
14
Statistics in Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 10%
1.3%
16
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
18
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
20
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Addiction
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Epidemiology
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 9%
0.7%