Back

Differences in Cardiac Mechanics among Genetically At-Risk First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study

Wilcox, J. E.; Beussink-Nelson, L.; Cao, J.; Kumar, R.; Jordan, E.; Ni, H.; Shah, S. J.; Hershberger, R. E.; Kinnamon, D. D.

2023-06-04 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.05.30.23290123 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsAmong genetically at-risk first-degree relatives (FDRs) of probands with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), the ability to detect changes in left ventricular (LV) mechanics with normal LV size and ejection fraction (LVEF) remains incompletely explored. We sought to define a pre-DCM phenotype among at-risk FDRs, including those with variants of uncertain significance (VUSs), using echocardiographic measures of cardiac mechanics. Methods and ResultsLV structure and function, including speckle-tracking analysis for LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), were evaluated in 124 FDRs (65% female; median age 44.9 [IQR: 30.6-60.3] years) of 66 DCM probands of European ancestry sequenced for rare variants in 35 DCM genes. FDRs had normal LV size and LVEF. Negative FDRs of probands with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants (n=28) were a reference group to which negative FDRs of probands without P/LP variants (n=30), FDRs with only VUSs (n=27), and FDRs with P/LP variants (n=39) were compared. In an analysis accounting for age-dependent penetrance, FDRs below the median age showed minimal differences in LV GLS across groups while those above it with P/LP variants or VUSs had lower absolute values than the reference group (-3.9 [95% CI: -5.7, -2.1] or -3.1 [-4.8, -1.4] %-units) and negative FDRs of probands without P/LP variants (-2.6 [-4.0, -1.2] or -1.8 [-3.1, -0.6]). ConclusionsOlder FDRs with normal LV size and LVEF who harbored P/LP variants or VUSs had lower absolute LV GLS values, indicating that some DCM-related VUSs are clinically relevant. LV GLS may have utility for defining a pre-DCM phenotype. Clinical Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03037632 Graphical AbstractDifferences in Cardiac Mechanics among Genetically At-Risk First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study. DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy, FDR = first-degree relative, GLS = global longitudinal strain, HF = heart failure, LP = likely pathogenic, LV = left ventricular, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, P = pathogenic, VUS = variant of uncertain significance. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=153 SRC="FIGDIR/small/23290123v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (59K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a1a86aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@37eadcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11c4f2dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@192234f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.9%
2
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.2%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
8
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
17
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%