Back

A comprehensive workflow for target adaptive sampling long-read sequencing applied to hereditary cancer patient genomes

Nakamura, W.; Hirata, M.; Oda, S.; Chiba, K.; Okada, A.; Mateos, R. N.; Sugawa, M.; Iida, N.; Ushiama, M.; Tanabe, N.; Sakamoto, H.; Kawai, Y.; Tokunaga, K.; NCBN Controls WGS Consortium, ; Tsujimoto, S.; Shiba, N.; Ito, S.; Yoshida, T.; Shiraishi, Y.

2023-06-01 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.05.30.23289318 medRxiv
Show abstract

Innovations in sequencing technology have led to the discovery of novel mutations that cause inherited diseases. However, many patients with suspected genetic diseases remain undiagnosed. Long-read sequencing technologies are expected to significantly improve the diagnostic rate by overcoming the limitations of short-read sequencing. In addition, Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers a computationally-driven target enrichment technology, adaptive sampling, which enables intensive analysis of targeted gene regions at low cost. In this study, we developed an efficient computational workflow for target adaptive sampling long-read sequencing (TAS-LRS) and evaluated it through application to 33 genomes collected from suspected hereditary cancer patients. Our workflow can identify single nucleotide variants with nearly the same accuracy as the short-read platform and elucidate complex forms of structural variations. We also newly identified SVAs affecting the APC gene in two patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, as well as their sites of origin. In addition, we demonstrated that off-target reads from adaptive sampling, which are typically discarded, can be effectively used to accurately genotype common SNPs across the entire genome, enabling the calculation of a polygenic risk score. Furthermore, we identified allele-specific MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in a Lynch syndrome patient. In summary, our workflow with TAS-LRS can simultaneously capture monogenic risk variants including complex structural variations, polygenic background as well as epigenetic alterations, and will be an efficient platform for genetic disease research and diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.