Back

Investigating individual variability in microstructural-functional coupling in the human cortex

Patel, R.; Dai, A.; Valk, S. L.; Desrosiers-Gregoire, G.; Devenyi, G. A.; Chakravarty, M. M.

2023-06-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.05.29.542730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the relationship between the structural and functional architecture of the human brain remains a key question in neuroscience. In this regard variation in cortical myelin may provide key insights into the functional organization. Previous findings have demonstrated that regions sharing myeloarchitectonic features are also likely to be structurally and functionally connected. However, this association is not uniform for all regions. For example, the strength of the association, or coupling, between microstructure and function is regionally heterogeneous, with strong coupling in primary cortices but weaker coupling in higher order transmodal cortices. However, the bases of these observations have been typically made at the group level, leaving much to be understood regarding the individual-level behavioural relevance of microstructural-functional coupling variability. To examine this critical question, we apply a multivariate framework to a combination of high-resolution structural, diffusion, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in a sample of healthy young adults. We identify four distinct patterns of coupling variation that vary across individuals. Remarkably, we find that while microstructural-functional coupling is consistently strong in primary cortices, significant variation in transmodal cortices exists. Importantly, we identified coupling variability maps and their association with behaviour that demonstrate the existence of latent dimensions of variability related to inter-individual performance on cognitive tasks. These findings suggest that the existence of behaviourally relevant coupling variation is a key principle for brain organization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.