Timing of Complete Multivessel Revascularization in Patients Presenting with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
Elscot, J. J.; Kakar, H.; Scarparo, P.; Den Dekker, W. K.; Bennett, J. R.; Schotborgh, C. E.; van der Schaaf, R. J.; Sabate, M.; Moreno, R.; Ameloot, K.; van Bommel, R. J.; Forlani, D.; Van Reet, B.; Esposito, G.; Dirksen, M. T.; Ruifrok, W. P. T.; Everaert, B. R. C.; Van Mieghem, C.; Pinar-Bermudez, E.; Alfonso, F.; Cummins, P.; Lenzen, M. J.; Brugaletta, S.; Daemen, J.; Boersma, E.; Van Mieghem, N. M.; Diletti, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundMultivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) is highly prevalent in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-ACS) and is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with single vessel disease patients. Complete revascularization of the culprit and all significant non-culprit lesions reduces the incidence of major adverse cardiac events, but the optimal timing of non-culprit artery revascularization remains unclear. MethodsThis prespecified substudy of the randomized BIOVASC trial included patients who presented with NSTE-ACS and MVD, defined as [≥] 1 non-culprit related coronary artery with a diameter of [≥] 2.5 mm and [≥] 70% stenosis as per visual estimation or positive coronary physiology testing. Risk differences of the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia driven revascularization or cerebrovascular events and its individual components were compared between the patients who were randomized to immediate and staged complete revascularization at 30 days and 1 year. ResultsThe BIOVASC trial enrolled 1525 patients, 917 patients presented with NSTE-ACS, of whom 459 were allocated to the immediate complete and 458 to the staged complete revascularization group. The incidences of the primary composite outcome were similar in the two groups (7.9% vs. 10.1%, risk difference 2.2%, 95%CI -1.5 to 6.0, p = 0.24). Immediate complete revascularization was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction (2.0% vs. 5.3%, risk difference 3.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9 to 5.7, p = 0.008), which was maintained after exclusion of procedure related myocardial infarctions occurring at the index or staged procedure (2.0% vs. 4.4%, risk difference 2.4%, 95%CI 0.1 to 4.7, p = 0.039). Unplanned ischemia driven revascularizations were also reduced in the immediate complete revascularization group (4.2% vs. 7.8%, risk difference 3.5%, 95%CI 0.4 to 6.6, p = 0.025). ConclusionsImmediate complete revascularization is safe in patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD and was associated with a reduction in myocardial infarctions and unplanned ischemia driven revascularizations at 1 year. Clinical PerspectiveWhat Is New? - This prespecified subanalysis of the BIOVASC trial shows that all spontaneous myocardial infarctions between the index and staged procedure occurred in the population of patients that initially presented with NSTE-ACS. At 30 days and 1 year patients randomized to immediate complete revascularization have fewer myocardial infarctions and unplanned ischemia driven revascularizations. What Are the Clinical Implications? - Immediate complete revascularization appears to be a safe strategy and can be a reasonable option for complete revascularization in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS and multivessel disease - In patients presenting with NSTE-ACS and multivessel disease, misjudgment of the culprit lesion or presence of multiple vulnerable plaques could have a role in the reduction of early occurring myocardial infarctions when performing an immediate complete strategy.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Year Real World Clinical Outcomes after Intravascular Imaging Device Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Ultrathin-Strut Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent 96%
- Psychosocial distress and health status as risk factors for ten-year major adverse cardiac events and mortality in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease 96%
- Temporal Variations in Ischemic and Bleeding Event Risks after Acute Coronary Syndrome during Dual Antiplatelet Therapy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-sensitivity cardiac troponin on presentation to rule out myocardial infarction: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial 94%
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia. The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study 97%
- Age-stratified Prevalence and Relative Prognostic Significance of Traditional Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: A Report from the Nationwide Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Japan 94%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 96%
- Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel: the Impact of Platelet Inhibition on Cerebrovascular Microembolic Events during TAVR 95%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 95%
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and treatment compliance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in France, the STOP SCA+ study 95%
- Autologous cardiac micrografts as support therapy to coronary artery bypass surgery 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.