Back

Pilot study of a ketogenic diet in bipolar disorder

Needham, N.; Campbell, I. H.; Grossi, H.; Kamenska, I.; Rigby, B. P.; Simpson, S. A.; McIntosh, E.; Bahuguna, P.; Meadowcroft, B.; Creasy, F.; Moses, T.; Burgess, K.; Brown, R.; Thrippleton, M.; Mitchell-Grigorjeva, M.; Norrie, J.; Gibbs, M. C.; McLellan, A.; Fisher, C.; Campbell, H.; Smith, D. J.

2023-06-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.05.28.23290595 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecent evidence from case reports suggests that a ketogenic diet may be effective for bipolar disorder. To date, no clinical trials have been conducted. AimsTo assess the recruitment and feasibility of a ketogenic diet intervention in bipolar disorder. MethodsEuthymic individuals with bipolar disorder were recruited to a 6-8 week trial of a modified ketogenic diet and a range of clinical, economic and functional outcome measures were assessed. ResultsOf 27 recruited participants, 26 commenced and 20 completed the modified ketogenic diet at 6-8 weeks. The completeness of the outcomes dataset was 95% for daily ketone measures, 95% for daily glucose measures and 95% for daily Ecological Momentary Assessment of symptoms during the intervention period. Mean daily blood ketone readings were 1.3 mmol/L (SD= 0.77, Median = 1.1), and 91% of all readings indicated ketosis indicating a high degree of adherence to the diet. Over 91% of daily blood glucose readings were within normal range with 9% indicating mild hypoglycaemia. Eleven minor adverse events were recorded, including fatigue, constipation, drowsiness and hunger. One serious adverse event was reported (euglycemic ketoacidosis in a participant taking SGLT2-inhibitor medication). ConclusionsThe recruitment and retention of euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder to a 6-8 week ketogenic diet intervention was feasible, with high outcome measure completion rates. The majority of participants reached and maintained ketosis and adverse events were generally mild and modifiable. A future randomised controlled trial is now warranted. Study Registration NumberISRCTN61613198

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.