Healthcare utilization and clinical characteristics of genetic epilepsy syndromes: a longitudinal case-control study of electronic health records
Bosselmann, C. M.; Ivaniuk, A.; St John, M.; Taylor, S. C.; Krishnaswamy, G.; Milinovich, A.; Leu, C.; Gupta, A.; Pestana-Knight, E. M.; Najm, I.; Lal, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding disease progression, age-specific comorbidities, medical treatment patterns, and unmet needs can help improve the care pathway of individuals with rare genetic epilepsies. A matched longitudinal cohort study has not been performed for these variables from childhood to adolescence across the whole phenome. MethodsWe identified individuals with likely genetic and non-genetic epilepsy syndromes and onset at ages 0-5 years by linkage across the Cleveland Clinic Health System. We used natural language processing to extract medical terms and procedures from longitudinal electronic health records (EHR) and tested for cross-sectional and temporal associations with genetic epilepsies. FindingsWe identified 503 individuals with genetic epilepsy syndromes and matched controls with epilepsy that did not receive genetic testing. The median age at the first encounter was 0{middle dot}1 years, 7{middle dot}9 years at the last encounter, and the mean duration of follow-up was 8{middle dot}2 years. We extracted 188,295 Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) annotations for statistical analysis across 9,659 encounters. Individuals with genetic epilepsy syndromes received an earlier epilepsy diagnosis and had more frequent and complex encounters with the healthcare system. Notably, the highest enrichment of encounters compared to the non-genetic groups was found during the transition from paediatric to adult care. Our computational approach could validate established comorbidities of genetic epilepsies, such as behavioural abnormality and intellectual disability. We also revealed novel associations for genitourinary abnormalities (OR 1{middle dot}91, 95% CI: 1{middle dot}66-2{middle dot}19, p = 2{middle dot}39x10-19) linked to a spectrum of underrecognized genetic syndromes. InterpretationThis study identified novel features associated with the likelihood of a genetic epilepsy syndrome and quantified the healthcare utilization of genetic epilepsies compared to matched controls with epilepsy who did not receive genetic testing. Our results strongly recommend early genetic testing to stratify individuals into specialized care paths, thus improving the clinical management of people with genetic epilepsies. FundingNot applicable.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Underutilization of Syndrome-Specific ICD-10 Codes for Genetic Epilepsies: Implications for Precision Medicine 94%
- Penetrance of pathogenic epilepsy variants is low and shaped by common genetic background 94%
- Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) Project: Predictors of lesion location and postsurgical seizure freedom in focal cortical dysplasia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genomic landscape across 474 surgically accessible epileptogenic human brain lesions 96%
- Genotype-phenotype correlations in SCN8A -related disorders reveal prognostic and therapeutic implications 95%
- Analysis of common PI3K-AKT-MTOR mutations in pediatric surgical epilepsy by droplet digital PCR reveals novel clinical and molecular insights 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene panels for epilepsy suggest that previously defined variants of unknown significance may play an important role in epilepsy and certain variants may be pathogenic when occurring together 94%
- Rest-Activity Rhythm Phenotypes in Adults with Epilepsy and Intellectual Disability 93%
- Frequency of and factors associated with antiseizure medication discontinuation discussions and decisions in patients with epilepsy: a multicenter retrospective chart review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.