Back

Fast and flexible Bayesian Jolly Seber models and application to populations with transients

Saracco, J. F.; Yackulic, C. B.

2023-05-26 ecology
10.1101/2023.05.25.542303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIJolly Seber (JS) models are an appealing class of capture-recapture models for modeling open populations because they allow for inferences about an array of population parameters, including abundance, survival, and recruitment. Multiple formulations of JS models have been developed and include both maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches. Bayesian approaches offer greater flexibility; however, they are often extremely slow when applied to moderate to large populations because the latent states of all observed individuals, as well as any potential unobserved individuals (parameter-expanded data augmentation), must be simulated at each time step. C_LIO_LIJS model implementations can be sped up dramatically through marginalization, whereby the conditional likelihoods of states are tracked for unique capture histories, rather than the simulated states of all individuals. Here we describe a marginalized implementation of a multistate JS model and compare its performance to that of an implementation using simulated discrete states. We fit models to data generated under two scenarios, one in which no data was missing and another in which 25% of data was randomly removed. To illustrate how marginalization can accommodate more complex models and datasets, we describe a modified version of the model for application to populations with transients and fit the model to simulated data and to data collected on Kentucky Warblers (Geothlypis formosa) as part of the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) program. C_LIO_LIBoth the discrete latent state and marginalized JS model implementations performed similarly with respect to bias and coverage; however, the marginalized implementation was roughly 1,000 times faster when no data were missing and 100 times faster when 25% of data was missing. The marginalized model accommodating transients also converged quickly and a more complex version of the model applied to the larger multi-site Kentucky Warbler data set yielded useful estimates of most parameters within a reasonable time frame (hours). C_LIO_LIGains in efficiency provided by marginalization shown here should stimulate additional study and development of this useful class of models and provide new opportunities for real-world applications to large complex data sets. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.8%
2
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.6%
5
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
10
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
12
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
16
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
18
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
23
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%
25
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%