Partnership-focussed Principles-driven Online co-Design (P-POD): a mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online co-design process.
Coulston, F.; Spittle, A.; McDonald, C.; Toovey, R.; Cameron, K.; Attard, K.; Binstock, L.; Fletcher, I.; Delaney, A.; Murphy, T.; Keating, C.; Sellick, K.
Show abstract
PurposeCo-design involves stakeholders in designing rehabilitation interventions that impact their health (end-users) or professional lives (clinicians and researchers). Partnership-focussed Principles-driven Online co-Design (P-POD) is proposed and evaluated as an authentic approach to adapting research co-design into an online environment. Materials and methodsA community-based participatory research approach scaffolded the co-design process and convergent mixed-methods evaluation. P-POD involved 10 stakeholders (parents, clinicians, coaches, and researchers) in eight 90-minute workshops to co-design a circus-based rehabilitation intervention to improve participation for preschool-aged children born preterm (premmies). P-POD was evaluated via anonymous surveys during workshops and semi-structured interviews upon completion of the process. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis. ResultsThe resulting co-designed intervention is "CirqAll: preschool circus for premmies". Evaluation of P-POD indicated adherence to guiding principles of stakeholder involvement and co-design. Themes describe participants experiences of the supportive online culture, room for healthy debate, power-sharing, and multiple definitions of success. ConclusionsP-POD appears to provide an authentic transition of research co-design into an online environment. P-POD was successfully used with stakeholders to produce a paediatric rehabilitation intervention, and benefits from the online approach align with, and extend on, those reported in the literature on in-person co-design approaches.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 95%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 94%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 96%
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 94%
- Barriers and facilitators to physical activity among Black women: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public involvement to enhance care home research; collaboration on a minimum data set for care homes 94%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.