Back

Understanding quantity and intensity of hospital rehabilitation using electronic health record data

Georgiev, K. S.; Doudesis, D.; McPeake, J.; Shenkin, S. D.; Fleuriot, J.; Anand, A.

2023-05-30 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.05.25.23290461 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMany hospitalised patients require rehabilitation during recovery from acute illness. We use routine data from electronic health records (EHR) to report the quantity and intensity of rehabilitation and compared this in patients with and without COVID-19. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults in whom COVID-19 testing was undertaken between March 2020 and August 2021 across three acute hospitals in Scotland. We defined rehabilitation contacts (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics and speech and language therapy) from timestamped EHR data and determined contact time from a linked workforce planning dataset. We included survivors to hospital discharge who received at least two rehabilitation contacts. The primary outcome was total rehabilitation time. Secondary outcomes included the number of contacts, time to first contact, and rehabilitation minutes per day. A multivariate regression analysis for predictors of rehabilitation time included age, sex, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status. FindingsWe included 11,591 consecutive unique patient admissions (76 [63,85] years, 56% female), of which 651 (6%) were with COVID-19, and 10,940 (94%) were admissions with negative testing. There were 128,646 rehabilitation contacts. Patients with COVID-19 received more than double the rehabilitation time compared to those without (365 [165,772] vs 170 [95,350] mins, p<0.001), and this was delivered over more specialist contacts (12 [6,25] vs 6 [3,11], p<0.001). Time to first rehabilitation contact was later in patients with COVID-19 (3 [1,5] vs 2 [1,4] days from admission). Overall, patients with COVID-19 received fewer minutes of rehabilitation per day of admission (14.1 [9.8,18.7] vs 15.6 [10.6,21.3], p<0.001). In our regression analyses, older age and COVID-19 were the most important predictors of increased rehabilitation time. InterpretationPatients with COVID received more rehabilitation contact time than those without COVID, but this was delivered less intensively. Rehabilitation data derived from the EHR represents a novel measure of delivered hospital care.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
28
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%