Back

Bridging Gaps: Improving access to general practice for and with marginalised patients

Potter, L. C.; Stone, T.; Swede, J.; Bridging Gaps group, ; Connell, F.; Cramer, H.; McGeown, H.; Carvalho, M.; Horwood, J. C.; Feder, G.; Farr, M. C.

2023-05-30 primary care research
10.1101/2023.05.24.23290453 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeople with severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD-combinations of homelessness, substance misuse, violence, abuse and poor mental health) have high health needs and poor access to primary care. AimTo explore perceptions and experiences of improving access to general practice for people with SMD in healthcare staff and people with lived experience. Design and SettingBridging Gaps is a collaboration between healthcare staff, researchers, women with lived experience of SMD and a charity that supports them in a UK city. We co-produced a project to improve access to general practice for marginalised patients, that was further developed with 3 inner city general practices. MethodWe observed six collaborative service improvement meetings at three general practices and conducted documentary analysis of minutes of a further three meetings. We interviewed nine practice staff and four participants with lived experience. Three participants with lived experience and one staff member who supports them participated in a focus group. Data was analysed inductively and deductively using thematic analysis. ResultsEnabling motivated general practice staff with time and funding opportunities, galvanised by lived experience involvement, resulted in sustained service changes. These included: care coordinators and patient lists to support access to patients in greater need and an information sharing tool. The process and outcomes improved connections within and between general practices, support organisations and marginalised patients. ConclusionThese co-produced strategies could be locally adapted and evaluated elsewhere. Investing in this different way of working may improve inclusion of marginalised groups, health equity and staff wellbeing. How this fits inThis study builds on previous work showing that continuity of care, being able to develop a trusting relationship and being proactive are of particular importance in providing care to highly marginalised patients(4, 5, 6, 7, 8). This work describes co-produced strategies including using care coordinators, patient lists and an information sharing tool to support access and continuity to patients in greater need, in addition to rich contextual information on how to shift ways of working to achieve this. In addition to a small team focused on marginalised patients, this study supports the literature highlighting the need for a trauma-informed approach throughout the whole practice team. These co-produced strategies could be adapted and piloted in other practices and areas. Investing in this focused way of working may improve inclusion of marginalised groups, health equity and staff wellbeing.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.8%
3
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
4
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.1%
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
7
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%