Back

Sex-biased gene expression and gene-regulatory networks of sex-biased adverse event drug targets and drug metabolism genes

Fisher, J. L.; Clark, A. D.; Jones, E. F.; Lasseigne, B. N.

2023-05-25 genomics
10.1101/2023.05.23.541950 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevious pharmacovigilance studies and a retroactive review of cancer clinical trial studies identified that women were more likely to experience drug adverse events (i.e., any unintended effects of medication), and men were more likely to experience adverse events that resulted in hospitalization or death. These sex-biased adverse events (SBAEs) are due to many factors not entirely understood, including differences in body mass, hormones, pharmacokinetics, and liver drug metabolism enzymes and transporters. MethodsWe first identified drugs associated with SBAEs from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Next, we evaluated sex-specific gene expression of the known drug targets and metabolism enzymes for those SBAE-associated drugs. We also constructed sex-specific tissue gene-regulatory networks to determine if these known drug targets and metabolism enzymes from the SBAE-associated drugs had sex-specific gene-regulatory network properties and predicted regulatory relationships. ResultsWe identified liver-specific gene-regulatory differences for drug metabolism genes between males and females, which could explain observed sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In addition, we found that [~]85% of SBAE-associated drug targets had sex-biased gene expression or were core genes of sex- and tissue-specific network communities, significantly higher than randomly selected drug targets. Lastly, we provide the sex-biased drug-adverse event pairs, drug targets, and drug metabolism enzymes as a resource for the research community. ConclusionsOverall, we provide evidence that many SBAEs are associated with drug targets and drug metabolism genes that are differentially expressed and regulated between males and females. These SBAE-associated drug metabolism enzymes and drug targets may be useful for future studies seeking to explain or predict SBAEs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.5%
5
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
7
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.5%
9
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
10
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Physiological Genomics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
21
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%