Back

New semi-automated tool for the quantitation of MR imaging to estimate in vivo muscle disease severity in mice

Waters, E. A.; Haney, C. R.; Vaught, L. A.; McNally, E. M.; Demonbreun, A. R.

2023-05-24 pathology
10.1101/2023.05.23.541310 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The pathology in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is characterized by degenerating muscle fibers, inflammation, fibro-fatty infiltrate, and edema, and these pathological processes replace normal healthy muscle tissue. The mdx mouse model is one of the most commonly used preclinical models to study DMD. Mounting evidence has emerged illustrating that muscle disease progression varies considerably in mdx mice, with inter-animal differences as well as intra-muscular differences in pathology in individual mdx mice. This variation is important to consider when conducting assessments of drug efficacy and in longitudinal studies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive method that can be used qualitatively or quantitatively to measure muscle disease progression in the clinic and in preclinical models. Although MR imaging is highly sensitive, image acquisition and analysis can be time intensive. The purpose of this study was to develop a semi-automated muscle segmentation and quantitation pipeline that can quickly and accurately estimate muscle disease severity in mice. Herein, we show that the newly developed segmentation tool accurately divides muscle. We show that measures of skew and interdecile range based on segmentation sufficiently estimate muscle disease severity in healthy wildtype and diseased mdx mice. Moreover, the semi-automated pipeline reduced analysis time by nearly 10-fold. Use of this rapid, non-invasive, semi-automated MR imaging and analysis pipeline has the potential to transform preclinical studies, allowing for pre-screening of dystrophic mice prior to study enrollment to ensure more uniform muscle disease pathology across treatment groups, improving study outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
14
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%