Back

Large-scale genomic rearrangements boost SCRaMbLE in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Li, T.; Zhao, S.; Cheng, L.; Hou, S.; Luo, Z.; Xu, J.; Yu, W.; Jiang, S.; Monti, M.; Schindler, D.; Zhang, W.; Hou, C.; Ma, Y.; Cai, Y.; Boeke, J. D.; Dai, J.

2023-05-22 synthetic biology
10.1101/2023.05.21.541650 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic rearrangements contribute to gene copy number alterations, disruption of protein-coding sequences and/or perturbation of cis-regulatory networks. SCRaMbLE, a Cre/loxP-based system implanted in synthetic yeast chromosomes, can effectively introduce genomic rearrangements, and is thus a potential tool to study genomic rearrangements. However, the potential of SCRaMbLE to study genomic rearrangements is currently hindered, because a strain containing all 16 synthetic chromosomes is not yet available. Here, we constructed a yeast strain, SparLox83, containing 83 loxPsym sites distributed across all 16 chromosomes, with at least two sites per chromosome. Inducing Cre recombinase expression in SparLox83 produced versatile genome-wide genomic rearrangements, including inter-chromosomal events. Moreover, SCRaMbLE of the hetero-diploid strains derived from crossing SparLox83 with strains possessing synthetic chromosome III (synIII) from the Sc2.0 project led to increased diversity of genomic rearrangements and relatively faster evolution of traits compared to a strain with only synIII. Analysis of these evolved strains demonstrates that genomic rearrangements can perturb the transcriptome and 3D genome structure and can consequently impact phenotypes. In summary, a genome with sparsely distributed loxPsym sites can serve as a powerful tool to study the consequence of genomic rearrangements and help accelerate strain engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.