Back

Distinct brain network features predict internalizing and externalizing traits in children and adults

Qu, Y. L.; Chen, J.; Tam, A.; Ooi, L. Q. R.; Dhamala, E.; Cocuzza, C.; Lawhead, C.; Yeo, B. T. T.; Holmes, A.

2023-05-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.05.20.541490 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Internalizing and externalizing traits are two distinct classes of behaviors in psychiatry. However, whether shared or unique brain network features predict internalizing and externalizing behaviors in children and adults remain poorly understood. Using a sample of 2262 children from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study and 752 adults from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), we show that network features predicting internalizing and externalizing behavior are, at least in part, dissociable in children, but not in adults. In ABCD children, traits within internalizing and externalizing behavioral categories are predicted by more similar network features concatenated across task and resting states than those between different categories. We did not observe this pattern in HCP adults. Distinct network features predict internalizing and externalizing behaviors in ABCD children and HCP adults. These data reveal shared and unique brain network features accounting for individual variation within broad internalizing and externalizing categories across developmental stages.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 14%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Mental Health
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
NeuroImage
○ 903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Molecular Psychiatry
○ 282 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
8
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.3%
9
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.0%
10
Biological Psychiatry
○ 137 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
11
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 12%
3.2%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.4%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
● 1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
○ 95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
15
Cerebral Cortex
◐ 396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Translational Psychiatry
○ 260 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
17
Network Neuroscience
● 126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
○ 71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
○ 96 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Neuron
○ 337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.