Back

The interplay between neoantigens and immune cells in sarcomas treated with checkpoint inhibition

Anzar, I.; Malone, B.; Samarakoon, P.; Vardaxis, I.; Simovski, B.; Fontenelle, H.; Meza-Zepeda, L. A.; Stratford, R.; Keung, E. Z.; Burgess, M.; Tawbi, H. A.; Myklebost, O.; Clancy, T.

2023-05-23 oncology
10.1101/2023.05.20.23290277 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sarcomas are comprised of diverse bone and connective tissue tumors with few effective therapeutic options for locally advanced unresectable and/or metastatic disease. Recent advances in immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), have shown promising outcomes in several cancer indications. Unfortunately, ICI therapy has provided only modest clinical responses and seems moderately effective in a subset of the diverse subtypes. To explore the immune parameters governing ICI therapy resistance or immune escape, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on tumors and their matched normal blood, in addition to RNA-seq from tumors of 31 sarcoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. We used advanced computational methods to investigate key immune properties, such as neoantigens and immune cell composition in the tumor microenvironment (TME). A multifactorial analysis suggested that expression of high quality neoantigens in the context of specific immune cells in the TME are key prognostic markers of progression-free survival (PFS). The presence of several types of immune cells, including T cells, B cells and macrophages, in the TME were associated with improved PFS. Importantly, we also found the presence of both CD8+ T cells and neoantigens together was associated with improved survival compared to the presence of CD8+ T cells or neoantigens alone. Interestingly, this trend was not identified with the combined presence of CD8+ T cells and TMB; suggesting that a combined CD8+ T cell and neoantigen effect on PFS was important. The outcome of this study may inform future trials that may lead to improved outcomes for sarcoma patients treated with ICI.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
5
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
8
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.3%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.0%
14
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
19
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
24
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
27
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
29
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%