Distinct roles for sequential NREM and REM acetylcholine-regulated states during sleep-dependent memory consolidation
Satchell, M.; Simmons, A.; Aton, S.; Zochowski, M.
Show abstract
Across vertebrate species, sleep consists of repeating cycles of NREM followed by REM. However, the respective functions of NREM, REM, and their stereotypic cycling pattern are not well understood. Using a simplified biophysical network model, we show that NREM and REM sleep can play differential and critical roles in memory consolidation primarily regulated, based on state-specific changes in cholinergic signaling. Within this network, decreasing and increasing muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) signaling during bouts of NREM and REM, respectively, differentially alters neuronal excitability and excitatory/inhibitory balance. During NREM, deactivation of inhibitory neurons leads to network-wide disinhibition and bursts of synchronized activity led by firing in engram neurons. These features strengthen connections from the original engram neurons to less-active network neurons. In contrast, during REM, an increase in network inhibition suppresses firing in all but the most-active excitatory neurons, leading to competitive strengthening/pruning of the memory trace. We tested the predictions of the model against in vivo recordings from mouse hippocampus during active sleep-dependent memory storage. Consistent with modeling results, we find that functional connectivity between CA1 neurons changes differentially at transition from NREM to REM sleep during learning. Returning to the model, we find that an iterative sequence of state-specific activations during NREM/REM cycling is essential for memory storage in the network, serving a critical role during simultaneous consolidation of multiple memories. Together these results provide a testable mechanistic hypothesis for the respective roles of NREM and REM sleep, and their universal relative timing, in memory consolidation. Significance statementUsing a simplified computational model and in vivo recordings from mouse hippocampus, we show that NREM and REM sleep can play differential roles in memory consolidation. The specific neurophysiological features of the two sleep states allow for expansion of memory traces (during NREM) and prevention of overlap between different memory traces (during REM). These features are likely essential in the context of storing more than one new memory simultaneously within a brain network.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A model of autonomous interactions between hippocampus and neocortex driving sleep-dependent memory consolidation 97%
- Widespread ripples synchronize human cortical activity during sleep, waking, and memory recall 95%
- Fully-primed slowly-recovering vesicles mediate presynaptic LTP at neocortical neurons 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stimulation augments spike sequence replay and memory consolidation during slow-wave sleep 95%
- Enhancement of hippocampal-thalamocortical temporal coordination during slow-frequency long-duration anterior thalamic spindles 95%
- Differential excitability of PV and SST neurons results in distinct functional roles in inhibition stabilization of Up-states 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dual roles of idling moments in past and future memories 96%
- Theory of spontaneous persistent activity and inactivity in vivo reveals differential cortico-entorhinal functional connectivity 96%
- Cortical Reactivation of Non-Spatial and Spatial Memory Representations Coordinate with Hippocampus to Form a Memory Dialogue 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.