Back

Integrative proteomics and network biology approach to identify potential urine based biomarkers for tuberculosis.

Subramaniam, S.; Varshney, A.; Singla, R.; Behera, D.; NANDA, R.

2023-05-21 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.05.19.23289652 medRxiv
Show abstract

Urine based biomarker discovery employing proteomics platform has been successfully attempted for multiple diseases. Urine is an excellent source of biomarker discovery but its potential is not fully tapped in tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics. In the present study, proteomic profiling of urine samples from thirty five subjects (Mean age=41 years (15-76), M/F=28/7) belonging to active TB, latent TB, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders (COPD) and healthy subjects were carried out employing a robust multiplex technique. We identified 131 proteins out of which 16 molecules showed at least two-fold change in TB. The study identified a signature of three putative markers, leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein (up-regulated), roundabout homolog 4 and isoform 2 of prostatic acid phosphatase (down-regulated) that could differentiate active TB from other pulmonary diseases. Besides, we investigated whether a network based approach can be efficiently used to expand dynamic coverage, gain a comprehensive view of underlying perturbed functions during the infection and to discover potential biomarkers. While comparing the functionally associated sub-networks of active TB with healthy urine proteome, we identified 54 proteins from the discriminative TB sub-network, some of which are known to be involved in the infection process. Few examples in this study like serpin peptidase inhibitor and catenin that has not been identified in the experiment but detected in the difference network demonstrate that proteomic profiling when integrated with network biology method could be a holistic approach to expand the dynamic range and identify potential candidate biomarkers and also provide a broad overview of perturbed functions during the infection.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
2
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
6
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%