Back

Repair oligodendrocytes demyelinating and disintegrating damaged axons after injury

Nocera, G.; Vaquie, A.; Hertzog, N.; Steil, K.; Canon Duque, S. L.; Miedema, J. M.; Bagin, C.; Tevosian, M.; Lutz, B.; Sharifi-Aghili, A.; Hegner, K.; Vollmer, D.; Bang, S.; Lee, S.-R.; Jeon, N. L.; Keyse, S. M.; Raigon Lopez, S.; Jacob, C.

2023-05-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.05.18.541273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

After a spinal cord injury, axons fail to regrow, which results in permanent loss of function1. This is in contrast with peripheral axons that can regrow efficiently after injury2. These differences are partly due to the different plasticity of myelinating cells, Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes, in these two systems3. The molecular mechanisms underlying this different plasticity remain however poorly understood. Here, we show that the phosphatase Dusp64 is a master inhibitor of oligodendrocyte plasticity after spinal cord injury. Dusp6 is rapidly downregulated in Schwann cells and upregulated in oligodendrocytes after axon injury. Simultaneously, the MAP kinases ERK1/2 are activated and the transcription factor c-Jun is upregulated in Schwann cells5,6, but not in oligodendrocytes. Ablation or inactivation of Dusp6 induces rapid ERK1/2 phosphorylation, c-Jun upregulation and filopodia formation in oligodendrocytes, leading to mechanically-induced, fast disintegration of distal ends of injured axons, myelin clearance and axonal regrowth. Together, our findings provide understanding of the mechanisms underlying the different plasticity of Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes after injury and a method to convert mature oligodendrocytes exhibiting inhibitory cues for axonal regrowth into repair oligodendrocytes reminiscent of repair Schwann cells. We show that repair oligodendrocytes successfully increase the compatibility of the spinal cord environment with axonal regrowth after injury, suggesting a potential use of repair oligodendrocytes as future therapeutic approach to treat spinal cord injuries.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.