Ordinary differential equations to construct invertible generative models of cell type and tissue-specific regulatory networks
Niktab, E.; Atkinson, P. H.; Walterfang, M.; Winship, I.; Sturley, S. L.; Munkacsi, A. B.
Show abstract
1Single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-seq) transcriptomics can elucidate gene regulatory networks (GRNs) of complex phenotypes, but raw sequencing observations only provide "snap-shots" of data and are inherently noisy. scRNA-seq trajectory inference has been utilized to solve for the missing observations, but disentangling complex dynamics of gene-gene interactions at different time points from aggregated data is a non-trivial task and computationally expensive. Here we describe our Non-Stiff Dynamic Invertible Model of CO-Regulatory Networks (NS-DIMCORN) to define the genetic nexus underpinning specific cellular functions using invertible warping of flexible multivariate Gaussian distributions by neural Ordinary differential equations. Our results yield a generative model with unbiased density estimation from RNA-seq read-count data only. This resulted in scalable time-flexible sampling of each genes expression level thence allowing ab initio assembly of gene regulatory networks in specific cells. We demonstrate our proposed methodology is superior to the state-of-the-art algorithms in accurately recovering genome-wide functional interactions, whether from synthetic or empirical data. We optimized our algorithm for GPU-based implementation thereby further enhancing the utility of our proposed methodology in comparison to the ten benchmarked methods.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- NetAct: a computational platform to construct core transcription factor regulatory networks using gene activity 97%
- Knowledge-primed neural networks enable biologically interpretable deep learning on single-cell sequencing data 97%
- Correcting gradient-based interpretations of deep neural networks for genomics 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.