Social-media based Health Education plus Exercise Programme (SHEEP) to improve muscle function among young-old adults with possible sarcopenia in the community a study protocol for intervention development
SHI, Y.; Stanmore, E.; McGarrigle, L.; Todd, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionPrevalence of possible sarcopenia is estimated to be significantly higher in community-dwelling older adults than that of confirmed or severe sarcopenia. However, there are currently far fewer non-pharmacological intervention strategies for possible sarcopenia than for sarcopenia in the community. Meanwhile, one type of non-pharmacological intervention in sarcopenic area, health education, is under-researched, and older peoples awareness about sarcopenia is extremely low, necessitating an immediate dissemination tool for prevention. Social media may be a potential, scalable, low-cost tool for this. This study protocol outlines how a social media-based multicomponent intervention will be co-designed with stakeholders to address this evidence gap. Methods and analysisGuided by the Medical Research Councils framework, the proposed research covers two phases that employ a co-design approach to develop a theory-based multicomponent intervention to increase sarcopenia prevention in the community. The participants will be recruited from young-old adults (60[~]69) with possible sarcopenia in the community of Changsha, China. Maximum sample size will be 45 participants in total, with 18[~]25 participants in the development phase and 15[~]20 participants in the pre-testing phase. During two rounds of focus groups with older adults, a social-media based intervention strategy will be developed from a theory-based conceptual model and an initial intervention plan formulated by the research group. After this, there will be a three-week pre-testing phase, followed by a semi-structured interview to further modify the theory-based conceptual model and the social-media based intervention strategy. The focus of the data analysis will be on thematic analysis of qualitative data primarily derived from the group interview and the semi-structured interview with key stakeholders. Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the University of Manchester Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 15664), and permissions have already been granted by collaborators in relevant Chinese organisations. We will collaborate with stakeholders to inform our dissemination strategy and co-present our findings (e.g., at community events or through social media). Furthermore, we will disseminate our findings to academics and healthcare professionals via webinars, academic conferences, and peer-reviewed publications. Strengths and limitations of this study- This is the first study to develop a health education and exercise intervention aimed at improving muscle function in community-dwelling young-old adults with possible sarcopenia. - This is the first study in the sarcopenic area to develop a multicomponent intervention for sarcopenia prevention based on social media (TikTok). - This study addresses some shortcomings of single text or audio materials or lengthy lessons in current health education for sarcopenia with short videos. - This study employs co-design to ensure that the intervention strategy is acceptable to relevant stakeholders and meets their needs by soliciting their input. - The sample size will be small that it may not be representative of the entire Chinese older population. - This study will not draw any conclusions about the intervention effectiveness due to the short duration of the pre-testing phase. - The study findings are unique to the community setting and population in China and may not be generalised to other settings or countries.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 96%
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 95%
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 96%
- Self-Rehabilitation Strategy for Rural Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Lower-Middle Income Country: A Delphi Study 94%
- Improving the detection and management of non-communicable diseases among the adult population of the catchment areas of a rural primary healthcare unit in Sidama National Regional State, Ethiopia: A study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 95%
- “If somebody had told me I’d feel like I do now, I wouldn’t have believed them…” Older adults’ experiences of the BELL trial: a qualitative study 95%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 93%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 92%
- Motor imagery training is beneficial for motor memory of upper and lower limb tasks in very old adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 95%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 92%
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.