Back

Social-media based Health Education plus Exercise Programme (SHEEP) to improve muscle function among young-old adults with possible sarcopenia in the community a study protocol for intervention development

SHI, Y.; Stanmore, E.; McGarrigle, L.; Todd, C.

2023-05-18 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2023.05.18.23290177 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPrevalence of possible sarcopenia is estimated to be significantly higher in community-dwelling older adults than that of confirmed or severe sarcopenia. However, there are currently far fewer non-pharmacological intervention strategies for possible sarcopenia than for sarcopenia in the community. Meanwhile, one type of non-pharmacological intervention in sarcopenic area, health education, is under-researched, and older peoples awareness about sarcopenia is extremely low, necessitating an immediate dissemination tool for prevention. Social media may be a potential, scalable, low-cost tool for this. This study protocol outlines how a social media-based multicomponent intervention will be co-designed with stakeholders to address this evidence gap. Methods and analysisGuided by the Medical Research Councils framework, the proposed research covers two phases that employ a co-design approach to develop a theory-based multicomponent intervention to increase sarcopenia prevention in the community. The participants will be recruited from young-old adults (60[~]69) with possible sarcopenia in the community of Changsha, China. Maximum sample size will be 45 participants in total, with 18[~]25 participants in the development phase and 15[~]20 participants in the pre-testing phase. During two rounds of focus groups with older adults, a social-media based intervention strategy will be developed from a theory-based conceptual model and an initial intervention plan formulated by the research group. After this, there will be a three-week pre-testing phase, followed by a semi-structured interview to further modify the theory-based conceptual model and the social-media based intervention strategy. The focus of the data analysis will be on thematic analysis of qualitative data primarily derived from the group interview and the semi-structured interview with key stakeholders. Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the University of Manchester Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 15664), and permissions have already been granted by collaborators in relevant Chinese organisations. We will collaborate with stakeholders to inform our dissemination strategy and co-present our findings (e.g., at community events or through social media). Furthermore, we will disseminate our findings to academics and healthcare professionals via webinars, academic conferences, and peer-reviewed publications. Strengths and limitations of this study- This is the first study to develop a health education and exercise intervention aimed at improving muscle function in community-dwelling young-old adults with possible sarcopenia. - This is the first study in the sarcopenic area to develop a multicomponent intervention for sarcopenia prevention based on social media (TikTok). - This study addresses some shortcomings of single text or audio materials or lengthy lessons in current health education for sarcopenia with short videos. - This study employs co-design to ensure that the intervention strategy is acceptable to relevant stakeholders and meets their needs by soliciting their input. - The sample size will be small that it may not be representative of the entire Chinese older population. - This study will not draw any conclusions about the intervention effectiveness due to the short duration of the pre-testing phase. - The study findings are unique to the community setting and population in China and may not be generalised to other settings or countries.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.