Back

Carrion converging: Skull shape is predicted by feeding ecology in vultures

Steinfield, K. R.; Felice, R. N.; Kirchner, M. E.; Knapp, A.

2023-05-18 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.05.17.541171 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The link between skull shape and dietary ecology in birds at macroevolutionary scales has recently been called into question by analyses of 3D shape that reveal that cranial anatomy is mainly influenced by other factors such as allometry. It is still unknown whether this form-function disconnect also exists at smaller evolutionary scales, for example within specialized ecological guilds. Vultures are a diverse guild of 23 extant species in two families (Accipitridae and Cathartidae) that exhibit phenotypic convergence as a result of highly-specialized feeding ecology. Vultures are the only known obligate scavengers among vertebrates and are usually grouped together under this single dietary category, but within this specialized diet there are three distinct, species-specific feeding strategies termed ripper, gulper, and scrapper. We use three-dimensional geometric morphometrics to quantify the relative contributions of feeding ecology, allometry, and phylogeny on vulture skull shape, along with several non-vulture raptors of similar size, range and ecology. Families show clear separation in shape, but phylogenetic signal is comparatively weak (Kmult = 0.33). Taking into account the influence of phylogeny, skull shape is not significantly correlated with either skull size or feeding type, but there are examples of strong, significant convergence and parallel shape evolution across feeding groups. Furthermore, skull shape performs strongly in predicting feeding ecology in a phylogenetic discriminant function analysis. These findings highlight the importance of detailed assessment of feeding behavior in studies of ecomorphology, rather than broader dietary categories alone, and reveal that ecology can be readily inferred from form given appropriate information.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.0%
5
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
6
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
10
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
13
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
14
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
17
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
23
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%